Really?
Auckland 2 Qs in semis
Hobart 4 unseeded with 2 of them Q in semis
Thailand unseeded final
Lyon 3-unseeded in semis
We also just had Linette SF at AO.
Number 1 seeds mostly held up well at least and the matches have been good.
I disagree with that - seeding is based on performance of last 52 weeks on all surfaces.
Yes, Begu was seeded and went out early in Linz and didn't reach QF.
Yes, Pera was seeded and went out early in Linz and didn't reach QF.
Yes, Kalinina was seeded and went out early in Linz and didn't reach QF.
But did you take into consideration, that Begu for example is aging and getting worse? Or that Pera got most points on clay? Sherif was often seeded, but outside of clay tournaments, she was never the biggest threat or even expected to hit her seeding.
We need to think more about QUALITY of player rather than SEEDING - that's why we are getting quality matches.
Yes, Vondrousova was NOT seeded, but anyone who knows her, knows why she was not seeded (injury) and how dangerous she is. Anyone who follows WTA knows that Vondrousova is heaps above those seeded. Tauson is still a relatively new player with high variance in results, but can play very well. So her reaching QF isn't what I'd call "draw breaking up".
Abu Dhabi had 6 seeds in QF, only non-seeded being Rogers and Zheng. Zheng is also in QF. Again, everyone knows how dangerous Rogers is and that Zheng is an uprising player with insane potential.
So sorry - I can't agree here. Also Linette was always good, just because results weren't there for a variety of reasons doesn't mean she hasn't always been dangerous and managed to upset many players throughout her entire career.
2023 looks fantastic so far for WTA tennis fans.