Titles no.4
What a season!
Anisi is a real deal. Next year slam please.
Hugs to Noskova, your time will come for sure, such a huge talented.
Like Pegula, Swiatek or Paolini? Did you see their third set losses?Not a match you'd look forward to watching the replay of. Mandy could have been taken out today by reasonable quality and consistency but Noskers just couldn't manage itA win is a win all the same.
Yep Amanda has a way higher ceiling. Question now is can she stay healthy and focused for the longer haul.Hopefully this quells the Paolini/Jabeur comparisons (even though they were silly in the first place).
Paolini & Jabeur have won WTA 1000 events and have multiple slam F's...Hopefully this quells the Paolini/Jabeur comparisons (even though they were silly in the first place).
Nah, Anisimova is the real deal and will dominate the tour next year winning 3 out of the 4 slams :sMentally Anisimova's sill catching up (not completely settled/adjusted to the big leagues. She just schooled a rookie in a final she was the odds on fave and supposed to dominate anyway, yet she's rolling on the floor celebrating like she herself just arrived on the scene.
What?You can literally feel how much she wants it now.
Paolini is useless vs. the top 2. Amanda's weapons put her on another level, even if the achievements are similar.Paolini & Jabeur have won WTA 1000 events and have multiple slam F's...
This doesn't move the needle, lmao.
Only Amanda can get rid of those comparisons by winning a slam 🤷♂️ not because you just feel she's better
Silly goose.
Iga can have the credit - but that Amanda was so nervous that she was completely unable to perform is a simple fact...Finals Iga might have had something to do with that. Amazing how people still don't give Swiatek full credit for winning Wimbledon. Not like her dominating a finals was a new thing.
We are ready to watchYea, Amanda is coming.
The tour is not ready!
Only Amanda can get rid of the comparisons to non slam winners by winning a slam until then you all are just fawning over some perceived ability that hasn't realized itself yet. Amanda and all her "weapons" still got 0-6, 0-6 in a GS final when the same can't be said for Jabeur or Paolini 🤷♂️Paolini is useless vs. the top 2. Amanda's weapons put her on another level, even if the achievements are similar.
She is fragile mentally. If you are not that type of human with huge self doubt plus potential Imposter syndrome you can never understand why Anisimova behaves like she does.Mentally Anisimova's sill catching up (not completely settled/adjusted to the big leagues. She just schooled a rookie in a final she was the odds on fave and supposed to dominate anyway, yet she's rolling on the floor celebrating like she herself just arrived on the scene.
I'm sure she replays the Wimbledon Final in her head at least once every day.She is fragile mentally. If you are not that type of human with huge self doubt plus Imposter syndrome you can never understand why Anisimova behaves like she does.
And Amanda has beaten her in 3/4 Slam venues and now beat Iga in a Slam as well. Paolini could never. A 5'2" player that came on at damn near age 30 isn't comparable to Amanda.Only Amanda can get rid of the comparisons to non slam winners by winning a slam until then you all are just fawning over some perceived ability that hasn't realized itself yet. Amanda and all her "weapons" still got 0-6, 0-6 in a GS final when the same can't be said for Jabeur or Paolini 🤷♂️
Jabeur beat Sabalenka at a slam and Paolini has 3 wins over Gauff this year. If you're gonna shit on them then keep the same energy for Amanda. Otherwise give them all props.