Hi everyone, I just registered so I could send a message to one of the users, since I found an old post of his/her very enlightening. Since I apparently can't, I will follow the proper channels and ask to the community. This is the reply that caught my attention, by the user "spiceboy":
www.tennisforum.com
I was doing some research on this topic, since I've always felt that Rebound Ace AO was a bit faster than Plexicushion AO. However, I find some conflicting information. For example, the linked source states that Rebound is faster, but if you look here:
Apparently the ITF says otherwise.
I just wanted to know what the original source from spiceboy was, and who's right in all of this... There must be some official data that doesn't contradict itself.
You guys will probably be a lot more knowledgeable on the topic than me, so any help would be much appreciated...
Thanks a lot everyone

Which surface is/was faster at the AO: Rebound Ace or...
I have no idea, and I'm watching some older highlights, and the ESPN team back in 2000 said that the Australian Open was maybe a little faster than the US Open. So which Australian Open was faster: Rebound Ace or Plexicushion?
I was doing some research on this topic, since I've always felt that Rebound Ace AO was a bit faster than Plexicushion AO. However, I find some conflicting information. For example, the linked source states that Rebound is faster, but if you look here:
Apparently the ITF says otherwise.
I just wanted to know what the original source from spiceboy was, and who's right in all of this... There must be some official data that doesn't contradict itself.
You guys will probably be a lot more knowledgeable on the topic than me, so any help would be much appreciated...
Thanks a lot everyone