Tennis Forum banner

QUEENS will be popular for players just awkward week!

2.4K views 42 replies 20 participants last post by  Smarter Force  
#1 ·
So amazing especially for us here in the UK to have Queens hosting the WTA 500, at first I was sad for Eastbourne but it actually means more coverage on the bbc and it's an amazing venue and feel. Shame it has to be week one after Roland Garros as I feel it's going to be popular especially with Laura at the helm!
 
#2 ·
There are only ever going to be a handful of players impacted by the proximity to Roland Garros. The grass court season is so short that it should appeal to any good grass players who have bowed out before Garros semis.

I just hope it's a success. Being in London gives it a better chance than Birmingham. And makes it easier for me, personally, to go. Which is obviously the most important consideration.
 
#7 ·
no, nothing like that, i've paid £35 centre court Wednesday and £25 ground pass Thursday
i think its great that i can just get the tube there but yes as Eastbourne has always been popular i do think that tournament has been treated badly
my friends who (unlike me) are staying loyal to Eastbourne want Queens to be a flop (especially the ones who dont live in London!). I was pleased to see a really good crowd on TV when i watched some of the Kasatkina v Kartal match today but my theory is it will be popular the first 2 or 3 years then the crowds might drop off but who knows
 
#8 ·
I went today and it was packed! Grounds were sold out at least. The venue is incredible and I do think the players absolutely love it. Brits are just generally the most knowledgeable crowds around and the ticket today was cheaper than opening day in Bad Homburg for instance. So overall a day very well spent. I just wonder what state the grass will be in for the men‘s tournament a week later.
 
#12 ·
I really love Eastbourne. I'd like to go to both, but not sure how the timing will work out for me.

A seat on centre court tomorrow, right at the back, is £20 + £5 booking fee.

Right at the back, on a small court like Queens, should be fine. It aint Arthur Ashe.

I suppose they are tinkering to try to get the best attendance. Eastbourne weekends are usually popular.
 
#15 ·
On the side of the court, which is where I've watched tennis matches from before, I find it makes a huge difference how high up I am, wanting to not be very high up, because seeing the shape on groundstrokes is important.

At Queens though, the biggest stand is at one end on both Centre Court and Court 1, so I was naturally stuck there. I actually found the view down the end better when higher up (likely there is a "within reason" clause). Unsurprising really because I can't stand the court-level camera on TV.

So you don't have to spend hundreds of pounds on a ticket, and in my opinion, you get a good view.
 
#17 ·
Well, I can confirm views are fine from the cheap seats.

It's nice to be closer, sometimes, but this was a last minute whim, so I didn't want to splurge, and it was worth the trip.

Queens has the least lovely grounds of the UK tournaments I've been to - Wimbledon is outright gorgeous, and Eastbourne is very pleasant. Queens is hemmed in and has no landscaped space. It's the easiest to get to by public transport, though.
 
#24 ·
How many courts can they use at Queens to play matches.?
Any way they could do a combined ATP/WTA event or is that not possible.
Maybe a 10 day 1000 event.
 
#27 ·
They used to have a 56 draw in the men's, maybe even a 64 further in the past.

There are 10 courts other than centre, but only 1 and 5 have any sort of seating, I think. Probably no others could be televised, either.

Running the two events together might be possible in terms of gettng matches played, but would give them no chance to sell extra tickets - the ATP event already sells out, and as noted, other than Centre Court, it's a cramped site, they really can't increase the number of spectators on site.

I'm afraid the women would be overwhelmingly shunted onto outer courts.
 
#25 ·
The BBC are not covering Eastbourne this year since they are covering Queens instead
 
#32 ·
[

I haven't been to Queens, but have gone to Eastbourne and it is a lovely venue! But it hasn't been very popular on TF, but I think mainly with posters who haven't actually been there and just see the big gusts of wind and seagulls. :LOL:
I like the seagulls! You just always have to pray they don't leave a deposit on you 😂 It is a lovely venue and hugely popular with a very loyal crowd. There are always loads of kids there too despite it's reputation as being God's waiting room.

They used to have a 56 draw in the men's, maybe even a 64 further in the past.

There are 10 courts other than centre, but only 1 and 5 have any sort of seating, I think. Probably no others could be televised, either.

Running the two events together might be possible in terms of gettng matches played, but would give them no chance to sell extra tickets - the ATP event already sells out, and as noted, other than Centre Court, it's a cramped site, they really can't increase the number of spectators on site.

I'm afraid the women would be overwhelmingly shunted onto outer courts.
I don't see any way they could hold a combined event. There's nowhere near enough space for the players or spectators. I popped on to court 5 yesterday and it's insanely cramped and a lot of the seats have the view blocked by the umpires chair and pillars supporting the stand. No leg room at all and the seats are uncomfortably packed together.
 
#34 ·
They can theoretically use more, and I think they occasionally do when rain delays get a bit extra, but they won't plan to use the courts with no seating for main draw matches.

To run two events at once would give them extra expenses, but no extra revenue, and I think it'd be very poor for spectators.