Tennis Forum banner
41 - 60 of 60 Posts
It is funny a bit to use the word "oligarch", specific for Russia. We can simply say - "rich people". They orient people to follow their attitudes, useful for them and too often negative for sport and whole world, and it is like that everywhere.
 
It is funny a bit to use the word "oligarch", specific for Russia. We can simply say - "rich people". They orient people to follow their attitudes, useful for them and too often negative for sport and whole world, and it is like that everywhere.
I would say the term oligarch is fine. It's just that in the 1990s, their main habitat was Russia, so might have heard about them most often linked to that country - with scattered enclaves in various countries - and has expanded to most of the world since. The main difference to plain rich people is the amount and especially type of influence in politics and/or whether they have way too much influence inside the justice system.
 
It is funny a bit to use the word "oligarch", specific for Russia. We can simply say - "rich people". They orient people to follow their attitudes, useful for them and too often negative for sport and whole world, and it is like that everywhere.
And in my mind the word "oligarch" is reserved for the dirty rich and not the "regular rich", with many, most (?) becoming rich thanks to selling natural resources from Eastern Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Psychologist
And in my mind the word "oligarch" is reserved for the dirty rich and not the "regular rich", with many, most (?) becoming rich thanks to selling natural resources from Eastern Europe.
Yes, dirty rich, often nouveaux riches......but it is similar with them anywhere, if not selling natural resources, then using illegal information, various tricks, influence, propaganda etc etc.
 
Yes, dirty rich, often nouveaux riches......but it is similar with them anywhere, if not selling natural resources, then using illegal information, various tricks, influence, propaganda etc etc.
You need an oligarchy to be an actual rather than a wannabe oligarch is maybe my point. For example, bent judges can appear in any system, but it only becomes a true oligarchy if a judge can get into trouble for actually applying the law impartially. And there are degrees - the shallow end is getting special tax concessions for your business, the deep end is a system where people who cut you off in traffic risk getting disappeared.
 
You need an oligarchy to be an actual rather than a wannabe oligarch is maybe my point. For example, bent judges can appear in any system, but it only becomes a true oligarchy if a judge can get into trouble for actually applying the law impartially. And there are degrees - the shallow end is getting special tax concessions for your business, the deep end is a system where people who cut you off in traffic risk getting disappeared.
Yes, and I still see it everywhere. Said generally, both West and East have seen "the other side" as completely corrupted.
Of course, there are times when it is more wild (including moments you concretely mentioned), but again it appears in various parts of the world.
 
It is a so brave and sincere interview. She blamed everybody who needed to be blamed.
Why did Kasatkina need to be blamed for anything?

What do you think about Kasatkina, who changed her citizenship?

"After her interview, it was clear she'd be transitioning. Dasha received far more help than anyone else."

- Federation?

- Yes. And she said that they didn’t help her at all.

- How did they help her?

– Financially, with a wild card. And everything else.
Kasatkina has publicly acknowledged the support provided by the federation, and its limitations. She has never said publicly they did not help her at all.


I'm talking about Dasha's situation: saying Russia sucks and then changing.
As the interviewer points out, Dasha never said Russia sucks. This supposed traitor to her own country paid for her compatriot Vika Lvova to attend three tournaments to keep her career afloat:


I also remember her responding to some attack saying how she dreamt of returning to Russia to give back and help future tennis players or sportspeople there, but I can't find it anywhere.

– If Kasatkina criticized the government rather than the country, is that acceptable?

- No.

Can’t you criticize the authorities?

- I don't think so. This is your country, your homeland.
I do hope you don't agree with this, at least.
 
She said A LOT of other stuff in this interview :lol2:
Like shading Alize Cornet who ditched her in doubles without any explanations once and then stopped talking to her.
Or saying Kasatkina shouldn't have talked trash about Russia because it's your country no matter what, and that her changing citizenship to Australia isn't as justifiable as those who do it with Kazakhstan for financial reasons.
Or openly admitting she celebrated the annexation of Crimea because "it's historical justice".

So, yeah.
Why doesn't she put two and two together and shut her mouth about the war for her own benefit? Those Irish Ukrainians at the local tennis clubs DO know who she is, and CAN access her opinions on the war and on Crimea and so forth. That's probably why they want the Irish clubs to kick her out.
 
Why doesn't she put two and two together and shut her mouth about the war for her own benefit? Those Irish Ukrainians at the local tennis clubs DO know who she is, and CAN access her opinions on the war and on Crimea and so forth. That's probably why they want the Irish clubs to kick her out.
Well, she didn't say anything about the war but according to the interviewer she posted something on IG celebrating the Crimea annexation back in 2014 :oops: :ROFLMAO:

I wonder if there's a TF thread about that?

Current war definely is not that popular but I guess it's because of all the sanctions and how is impacting her life. She whined a lot in the interview but one thing is for sure, she's not gonna criticize the government because you 'can't talk bad about your country'. She'll blame everyone else instead :eyeroll::eyeroll:
 
Right? Players like Diatchenko make me curious as her lifestyle doesn’t seem possible on her fairly modest prize money. I guess she’s from an affluent background but it doesn’t fully add up.
Apparently her dad works for United Nations...a politician I guess
 
this interview is very propaganda coded

I also doubt that Irish tennis clubs need to know nationality whatsoever to book a court and even if they did - who’s going to know by looking at her to get upset?
Ireland as a whole is very pro-Ukraine.
I wouldn’t be at all surprised that being Russian would be a problem in a club like Carrickmines.
Particularly at that time.
 
41 - 60 of 60 Posts