Tennis Forum banner

1 - 11 of 11 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Looks like the WTA have given out their bonuses this week - Venus gets $140,000, Serena gets $50,000 and Jennifer gets just $30,000!!! Martina Hingis got a whopping $300,000 and Lindsay got $270,000!!!

I haven't worked out the others, but Jen's is pathetic compared to most others!?!

What are these bonuses based on?

NOV 5 EARNINGS:<br /> 1 VENUS WILLIAMS USA $2,522,610<br /> 2 JENNIFER CAPRIATI USA $2,238,624<br /> 3 SERENA WILLIAMS USA $2,086,263<br /> 4 LINDSAY DAVENPORT USA $1,832,242<br /> 5 MARTINA HINGIS SUI $1,465,116<br /> 6 KIM CLIJSTERS BEL $1,314,659<br /> 7 JELENA DOKIC YUG $1,155,716<br /> 8 JUSTINE HENIN BEL $995,704<br /> 9 LISA RAYMOND USA $946,385<br /> 10 AMELIE MAURESMO FRA $867,702

NOV 12 EARNINGS<br /><a href="http://www.sanexwtatour.com/content/pdfs/YTD%20Prize%20Money%20Top%20100.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.sanexwtatour.com/content/pdfs/YTD%20Prize%20Money%20Top%20100.pdf</a>

[ November 12, 2001: Message edited by: www.capriati.co.uk ]</p>
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,865 Posts
Discussion Starter #2
Is nobody else baffled by this?

Anke Huber got a bigger bonus than Jennifer Capriati?

Serena Williams got more than Jennifer Capriati?

Jennifer played her 17 events, I don't understand!?!

Why should Hingis get so much more than everyone else?

It makes NO SENSE!?!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,635 Posts
I thought bonusmoney were based on the worldranking <img src="confused.gif" border="0"> This is dumb <img src="frown.gif" border="0">

[ November 12, 2001: Message edited by: irma ]</p>
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
20,610 Posts
Probably on popularity...
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
53 Posts
I think Bonus money is based on a players 'Q' rating at the start of the year and is worked out according to the number of events they are able to commit to each year.

I would say players like Hingis, Davenport and V Williams at the start of the year were on a bonus of $400,000 and ended up getting less due to not meeting total committments due to injury or otherwise.

I guess for some reason Jen was to highly rated at teh start of the year and maybe actually got what she was entitled to according to her 'Q'. I am sure she will have a much higher rating next year - possibly $400.000

And before someone asks - no Anna is not on the top level cause believe it or not tennis is actually taken into account or should I say success on the court!

--------

I will add a disclaimer here - this is what I have been told and what i can remember of it - it may not be entirely correct so don' t blast me for inaccuracies OK <img src="graemlins/kiss.gif" border="0" alt="[Kiss]" />
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,059 Posts
Ahh...thanks for the info Penne!
 

·
Plainclothes Division
Joined
·
6,350 Posts
If it's related to the "commitment list" the bonuses are based on rankings after the US Open (2000). Next year's would thus be based on the rankings after this year's USO.

Testing the acronym command on <acronym>BRIAN</acronym>

[ November 17, 2001: Message edited by: Brian Stewart ]</p>
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
265 Posts
I read somewhere that the "commitment list' upon which those bonuses are calculated have to due with rankings, record and attractiveness to the promoters, which is something akin to a 'Q' or popularity rating.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,726 Posts
I take it that the results of "Venusgate" were in Miss Williams' favor? <img src="graemlins/angel.gif" border="0" alt="[Angel]" />
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
265 Posts
I read somewhere that nothing came of it..although the very idea of questioning a players injury is a fool's game. How are they supposed to determine with any degree of certainty how much pain Venus (or Lindsay) was in 2 or 3 weeks ago? What are these fools thinking?

[ November 12, 2001: Message edited by: Larrybid ]</p>
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
Top