Joined
·
21,399 Posts
No longer slamless. Where do you put her in the Hall of the fame list
Of coures she will be in but the point is where do you put her, ahead or below Kvitova, Kerber, Azarenka, Li Na..A grand slam, YEC, 5 tier I titles, 21 other titles, year end no.1 2010 and 2011 and world no.1 again in 2018. She definitely deserves HoF if people like Roddick can get in
Azarenka absolutely, but Kvitova I'm not sure. She never had the #1 ranking and was always up and down. With Angie it depends on the criteria. If it's all about slams it's Angie. But Woz has more titles (YEC included). Angie has a silver medal though. Close one.Despite Angie having more slams, I think Wozniacki's career is more complete.
However, I would still rate Kvitova/Azarenka above Caro.
Agree with every words you said but for me I put Kvi above because of her amazing game :kiss:She's definitely above the likes of Ivanovic, Fran, Nastya, Sloane .... (i am not including Ostapenko because she's very young and I think Aljona won't be one slam wonder). I think she's below Kerber/Azarenka now Li was never number one but she has slams at two different surfaces so I wouldn't put her below Woz. I can't decide about Kvitty who was never number one either (she does have 2 GS+ 6PM/P5 wins + YEC) so I am putting her above Woz mostly due to personal preference.
Kvitova has everything that Wozniacki has. Except for Kuala Lumpur of courseAzarenka absolutely, but Kvitova I'm not sure. She never had the #1 ranking and was always up and down. With Angie it depends on the criteria. If it's all about slams it's Angie. But Woz has more titles (YEC included). Angie has a silver medal though. Close one.
Yeah. This 100%.She's definitely above the likes of Ivanovic, Fran, Nastya, Sloane .... (i am not including Ostapenko because she's very young and I think Aljona won't be one slam wonder). I think she's below Kerber/Azarenka now Li was never number one but she has slams at two different surfaces so I wouldn't put her below Woz. I can't decide about Kvitty who was never number one either (she does have 2 GS+ 6PM/P5 wins + YEC) so I am putting her above Woz mostly due to personal preference.
Carolines tennis is mostly boring and gives me no inspiration, but she works hard and successfuly replaces talent with hard work, which is OK for me.No longer slamless. Where do you put her in the Hall of the fame list
Petra won GS mostly because of her game, not the luck draw. So Petra is alway better for meCarolines tennis is mostly boring and gives me no inspiration, but she works hard and successfuly replaces talent with hard work, which is OK for me.
Her titles collection incl. YEC and Slam is brilliant as well, tough comparing her with Petra who has 2 slams, 1 YEC, 6 Tier 1 titles, 8 P470 titles, 5 Fed Cups and Olymics bronze is totally impossible, Caroline is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay behind her.
Well described as always. Youve got the point.Petra won GS mostly because of her game, not the luck draw. So Petra is alway better for me
Ahead of all recent 1-slam holders Ostapenko, Schiavone, Stephens, Myskina, Ivanovic, Pennetta, Bartoli, Stosur.No longer slamless. Where do you put her in the Hall of the fame list
Ahead of all recent 1-slam holders Ostapenko, Schiavone, Stephens, Myskina, Ivanovic, Pennetta, Bartoli, Stosur.
Then I would say
Azarenka > Kvitova > Wozniacki/Kuznetsova > Kerber > Li > Muguruza.