I thought about exactly this today before the match. As funny as flukes like Ostapenko and Barty are, it is bad for tennis because there is no correct scale anymore. Everybody knows that Radwanska is greater but it would be so much nicer if she had at least 2 slams. It all feels completely wrong, many people will say that the biggest title counts.
I don't get why people compare barty to skilled weird players like aga or even Santoro. she doesn't have the weird tricks or the impossible shots, she just plays a lot of slice. also, she has a powerful serve and forehand, unlike aga.