Tennis Forum banner

1 - 10 of 10 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,064 Posts
IMO, Barty has to stay in the top for a lot more time than that to be considered greater than Radwanska or someone like Dementieva for example...
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
704 Posts
Aga was too worried about gaining muscle and looking un-feminine to win a grand slam. Hope her man and her are pleased with her lack of a slam career but sexy body
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
324 Posts
I thought about exactly this today before the match. As funny as flukes like Ostapenko and Barty are, it is bad for tennis because there is no correct scale anymore. Everybody knows that Radwanska is greater but it would be so much nicer if she had at least 2 slams. It all feels completely wrong, many people will say that the biggest title counts.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,480 Posts
I don't get why people compare barty to skilled weird players like aga or even Santoro. she doesn't have the weird tricks or the impossible shots, she just plays a lot of slice. also, she has a powerful serve and forehand, unlike aga.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,236 Posts
Radwanska, easily (NOT her fan, and never was, to be clear...).

Although Barty has a lot of time to surpass her...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
465 Posts
Yes, let's compare a retired player to a 23 year old. Great idea.
This! If it had said 'more talented', ok, but how on earth can we compare who is greater when they are in total different stages of their respective careers?
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
Top