[ONS-GOAT]

Both are the best of their era.

Both have 5 Wimbledon titles.

Who.is.the best?

 

[cellophane]

Re: Who os the better grasscourter: Venus or Serena?

Close.... but Venus. Beat Davenport in final X 2. Played higher level tennis in most of them probably.

 

[HG2020]

Re: Who os the better grasscourter: Venus or Serena?

Venus is slightly better on grass.

 

[SV_Fan]

Re: Who os the better grasscourter: Venus or Serena?

Venus.

 

[olympus28]

Re: Who os the better grasscourter: Venus or Serena?

After that, please don't tell me that Serena is the best on grass. Except her serve, she is very poor

 

[ONS-GOAT]

Maybe Venus has a slight advantage, she comes to the net more

 

[dsanders06]

Venus.

 

[sweetadri06]

I would say Venus plays better on grass. But Serena can pass her in total slam titles here.

 

[doomsday]

We had this thread like 2 days ago, Venus.

 

[shoryuken]

Venus still has that extra final 5-3 vs 5-2 for Serena

 

[Lord Choc Ice]

Vee's last remaining wig and Ree just snatched it .

For all of Vee's game better suited for grass, Serena's 3-1 against her in Wimbledon finals (3-2 at Wimbledon overall), and now that she's equalled her title count there's really no argument for Venus anymore. A game more suited to the surface means nothing if you can't implement it more times than your sister who's only serve is really suited for grass.

 

[Sister Price]

Vee's last remaining wig and Ree just snatched it .

 

[MrSerenaWilliams]

Venus still has that extra final 5-3 vs 5-2 for Serena

Isn't it more impressive that she won as many titles in 8 finals as Venus did in 9? :shrug:

 

[dsanders06]

Isn't it more impressive that she won as many titles in 8 finals as Venus did in 9? :shrug:

:spit:

I guess Myskina must be greater than Serena then, seeing as she has a 100% winning record in Slam finals and Serena doesn't

 

[spiritedenergy]

Serena

 

[MrSerenaWilliams]

:spit:

I guess Myskina must be greater than Serena then, seeing as she has a 100% winning record in Slam finals and Serena doesn't

Really?!


Serena's seen 17 more major finals than Myskina.


I know you're pressed, but come on.

 

[TS]

Pironkova, oops I mean Serena.

 

[Alexander18]

Isn't it more impressive that she won as many titles in 8 finals as Venus did in 9? :shrug:

No.

That would only make sense if Serena had only entered 8 Wimbledon tournaments and those were her results every time (being a finalist or winner).

With your logic, in this scenario of Wimbledon results for two players:

Player A: Winner - Lost 1R - Lost 1R - Lost 1R - Lost 1R
Player B: Winner - Runner Up - Runner Up - Runner Up - Runner Up

Player A would be better than player B for having won the title once in 1 Final, whereas player B won the title once in 5 finals.

 

[MrProdigy555]

Tie.

 

[MrProdigy555]

No.

That would only make sense if Serena had only entered 8 Wimbledon tournaments and those were her results every time (being a finalist or winner).

With your logic, in this scenario of Wimbledon results for two players:

Player A: Winner - Lost 1R - Lost 1R - Lost 1R - Lost 1R
Player B: Winner - Runner Up - Runner Up - Runner Up - Runner Up

Player A would be better than player B for having won the title once in 1 Final, whereas player B won the title once in 5 finals.

Eh, that's not really fair, comparing winning something once, to having MULTIPLE Grand Slams. I rather win 5/7 than 5/8, you know?