Vote!
it was absurd in reference to Serena, even more absurd with NovakWomen's and men's tennis records used to be seperate. Why do all of a sudden records are mixed together ? Pseudo feminism ?
This is the first I’ve heard that Billy Jean King was Australian. She played at AO several times.exactly. those were basically national aussie champs
And did some of that after giving birthMargaret Court won 64 grand slam titles - Novak has only won 24.
Happy April Fools!Vote!
Borg is a very poor comparison given that he never won the US Open in spite of reaching the final multiple times (and having an annual attempt at winning it rather than one every four years). And he kept flopping in New York even in the three years when the tournament was held on green clay in Forest Hills. If you're going to hold Djokovic's lack of an Olympic medal against him, a player who famously did not win what was the second biggest title in the sport back then is not the yardstick to measure him against.He's a goat at tennis, but he has the same number of Olympic Medals as contemporaries such as Kei Nishikori and Pablo Currena Busta. And 0 Gold Medals despite competing at 4 different Olympics where he was a top 5 player. Don't think Rod Laver or Bjorn Borg would be getting mollywhopped by midcarders while representing their country if the Tennis at the Olympics existed in the olden days.
In my eyes if Novak is to be taken seriously as the GOAT over Margaret he really needs to start winning some mixed doubles at the slams. If he gets a move on starting in Melbourne he might soon reach Mrs Court's impressive 21 mixed titles.girl those 64 slam titles dont count as more than 3 or 4 real slams. get real
im far from being a djokovic fan but comparing their achievements is just riddiculous
Maybe so people can belittle Margaret Court’s accomplishments for the upteenth time because she had the misfortune of being born in 1942 and she also has religious views that don’t align with theirs.Women's and men's tennis records used to be seperate. Why do all of a sudden records are mixed together ? Pseudo feminism ?
To be fair to Novak, I’m sure he’d adjust if playing best of 3 matches in slams rather than best of 5. The dynamic is completely different.In best of three, he would lose to Djere and not win the US Open. Probably there are more matches when he won from 0-2 or 1-2 down, so his slam count would be also lower. So in a way best of five can save you more because it gives you more time for a comeback.
Sports media always needs something to talk about. Even though it’s apples and oranges for obvious reasons, a Court/Djokovic comparison will get people to talk about tennis.It's obviously Djokovic, much as I dislike him.
Having said that, I don't know why a lot of the media and fans now appear to be combining male and female records. It doesn't make sense to me, as they are two different competitions.
These debates are always subjective, though a lot of people don’t think soJust because you have the most slams doesn’t necessarily mean you the “greatest”, there are other factors as well…
Excuse me, but you are saying this as an Emma's fan? And as a fan of WTA?Yes, one of the many reasons why it's a shame that he's tennis GOAT. But it is what it is.
What are you on about?Excuse me, but you are saying this as an Emma's fan? And as a fan of WTA?
If the goats of ATP are boring for you, you just can't be a fan of any WTA player.