Tennis Forum banner
1 - 20 of 29 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,843 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
You'll notice I put 'when', not 'if'. :p

Anyway, it seems to be widely acknowledged that Anna K's relative lack of success tennis-wise (relative to that which everyone predicted for her five years ago) is, at least in part, due to a lack of confidence. What started out as a minor thing - she virtually began her career in top tournaments which she wasn't likely to win straight away - has become a monkey on her back, which makes her a laughing-stock amongst those too ill-informed about tennis to appreciate her talent as well as a media keen to present her as a mere bimbo. She's played well this year, but has insisted on playing events where she has to face players that, right now, she CANNOT beat. Sooner or later she'll realise this, trot off to Bogota or Sopot or somewhere and pick up a title.

With this monkey off her back, will she regain the confidence she had in '97/'98? She DOES have the talent to be a TOP player; with her potential game (not current game) she can win Wimbledon. So will she finally blossom?

Or will she think to herself: I've won a tournament now. No need to work on my game any more; I'm a legitimate top 20 player who'll win 2 or 3 tournaments in my career (see: Schett, Testud) and spring the odd upset; I'll continue to stagnate?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
2,029 Posts
It's anyone's guess how her first title will affect her play and attitude. It's all up to Anna. I'm seriously hoping it will boost her confidence but I won't hold my breath.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,402 Posts
I wouldn't say it's a matter of confidence since she seems to prefer the challenge of top players over the less talented. I think it will remove the anxiety she feels when facing critical moments of a given match - particularly the final.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,626 Posts
I agree with Bright Red. When is that not a occurence!

I would also like to add that it will hopefully embolden her to continue to win. Besides confidence, another problem Anna seems to have is giving up in a particularly tight match. While that may work against a lower ranked player, it will cost her the match against a top ranked player.

I would like to see her get a couple of good wins under her belt. Even an odd slam final would be nice, especially at Wimbledon since that was her first real success and her game suits grass so well.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,212 Posts
She'll say something rash. "Winning this Tier V proves I'm a top player on tour."
It will help her confidence.
Every player currently in the top ten, when healthy, is better than they were the last time Anna was a top ten player.
Anna's work ethic will not be adversely affected by success.

Here's Anna's record since she began 2001 ranked #8. After a shaky start, we results we'd expect of the #8 players. Semis and quarters.

2r 2001 Sydney ....... - Corina MORARIU (USA) 2-6 1-6
QF 2001 OZ ........... - Lindsay DAVENPORT (USA) 4-6 2-6
SF 2001 Tokyo ........ - Lindsay DAVENPORT (USA) 1-6 7-6(5) 0-6
QF 2001 Paris ........ - Amelie MAURESMO (FRA) 6-2 6-7(4) 1-6

Then she gets hurt. DNP 13 Feb - 29 Jul

Perhaps she returns too soon.

2r 2001 San Diego .... - Nicole PRATT (AUS) 7-6(1) 1-6 3-6

And misses six more weeks. DNP 06 Aug - 23 Sept

But since then she's played in ELEVEN tournaments. That's a whole year for Serena. :) I think Anna's displaying the form she has now.

2r 2001 Leipzig ...... - Anastasia MYSKINA (RUS) 4-6 6-3 3-6
1r 2001 Moscow ....... - Galina FOKINA (RUS) 2-6 6-1 2-6
1r 2001 Stuttgart .... - Anne KREMER (LUX) 6-4 2-6 5-7
1r 2001 Zurich ....... - Amanda COETZER (RSA) 0-6 6-4 3-6
QF 2001 Luxembourg ... - Kim CLIJSTERS (BEL) 5-7 6-7(2)

***
YEAR END BREAK
***

SF 2002 Auckland ..... - Anna SMASHNOVA (ISR) 1-6 4-6
2r 2002 Sydney ....... - Serena WILLIAMS (USA) 2-6 6-4 3-6
1r 2002 OZ ........... - Justine HENIN (BEL) 2-6 5-7
2r 2002 Tokyo WIN .... - Elena DEMENTIEVA (RUS) 7-6(4) 7-6(5)
SF 2002 Tokyo ........ - Monica SELES (USA) 3-6 6-3 3-6
2r 2002 Paris ........ - Amelie MAURESMO (FRA) 3-6 5-7
2r 2002 Antwerp ...... - Venus WILLIAMS (USA) 5-7 0-6

ONE 'quality' win. Over Demetieva in Tokyo 2002.
Four 1st round losses, four 2nd round losses since her return last September. And two of those 2nd round losses were her last two tournaments.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
314 Posts
Sooner or later she'll realise this, trot off to Bogota or Sopot or somewhere and pick up a title.
She doesn't seem to want to "trot off to Bogota" to pick up a title. My question is: Why is she in Dubai preparing to play Venus in the second round for the third straight week when she could be in Memphis where the top seed is Amanda Coetzer?:confused: I'm not saying she could beat Amanda but she might have gotten past the second round.:rolleyes:

Anna is around #89 in the world. She's going to meet the #1 or #2 player in the first or second round of EVERY tournament she enters. She's got to improve that ranking and the only way to do that is to play in smaller tournaments. I don't understand why her advisors aren't telling her that.

But, to answer your original question . . . I have no idea what will happen to Anna should she win a tournament. It might give her confidence but, on the other hand, the uproar in the media would be so enormous it might scare the poor thing and put even more pressure on her.:)
 
G

·
Personally, I feel, you'll see the Anna Kournikova we all wanted to see emerge from her 1997 rise to fame. Anna does have the game inside her, youcan see it, but you can also see that lack of confidence. I think that a title behind her will build up mental resillence, something which she lacks at the moment in agreat way. I really hope Anna can prove her critics wrong, in an unbelievably weird way it is a shame she is one of the most beautiful women in the world because underneath there is a damn good player who just has to come to the fore again. I agree with adnil and destucto_girl, it's a block, once she overcomes it she can go far...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,212 Posts
Gotta agree with essielewis. Playing the top payers every week is not smart unless you are one of them. If you beleive she has the abiity to win Wimbledon, you're basically saying she has the ability of Serena Williams. Enough to be a top ten player and win a GS.

Anna ended 2000 ranked #8. Serena is currently #9. This week, Anna's ranking is #83. She has 399 points in 12 tournaments. Serena has 2875 points in 9 tournaments. Other players get injured and have long layoffs and losses of confidence. Venus, Serena, Amelie, Monica and Lindsay have all lost a lot of time the last 2 years to injuries. But they came back competitive. For some reason, Anna has not.

Anna is averaging 33.25 points per tournament in her last 12 tournaments. This is not good. By comparison, Venus Williams, (A player whom Anna was compare favorably to four years) averages 335 point per tournament. The worst ppt in the top ten is Amelie Mauresmo at 148 ppt. Anna's healthy, and has all the weapons she had in 2002. Her confidence can't be that much worse. She hadn't won anything before she got hurt last year. She's not gonna suddenly conclude that NOW she can't win.

Anna peer group is 7 other players in the top ten.

Venus, Serena, Kim, Justine, Amelie, Jelena, Martina. All have at least been in a GS final, except Jelena, who's won a couple Tier I's. Short of stealing Martina's or Venus's brain, I don't see how Anna can compete with them. She's athletic enough, but I can't name one mental or emotional trait Anna has that's an advantage for a tennis player during a match.
 

·
Moderator - Juniors
Joined
·
13,524 Posts
When the likes of Lindsay, Serena, Venus or Seles have a long layoff, they all still remain in the top 10. Anna dropped down almost out of the top 100, meaning every week she tries to comeback, she's unseeded and trying to beat a top 10 player 1st or 2nd round. Her losses this year have certainly not been bad (Smashnova wasn't good, but at least she went and won that title + another one the next week). I don't see how it's fair to compare her results with the others who got injured and stayed top 10 with the long layoffs, because I don't see them having to play other top 10 players right off the bat. Who knows how they'd do under those circumstances. I think Anna's had a goo start to the year, she's losing to the top 10 players right now, but she has given them all decent matches and I think that's a good sign for someone who seems to be "fragile" in confidence as it is, according to some.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
314 Posts
but she has given them all decent matches
Venus gave her a bagel last week and Anna barely got by a Tunisian qualifier yesterday. I don't really call that playing well.

Playing the top payers every week is not smart unless you are one of them
Absolutely! And your statistics were very revealing. There is no way Anna will get back into the top 10 unless she picks up points in smaller tournaments. All of the other girls have become very, very good. Anna got to the top 10 before, without winning a tournament, because she could beat her peers. Her peers have gotten better and Anna hasn't. Besides, none of them want to lose to Anna so they raised their game when they play her.

I feel sorry for Anna. She's obviously receiving very bad advice.:sad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25,212 Posts
It's easy to be fooled by the quality of Anna's opponents. However, I view this year as an extension of Anna's post USOpen 2001. The results are the same. 1st and 2nd round losses with an ocassional semi. If I remove the names of her 2002 conquerers ....

2r 09-24-01 Leipzig - Anastasia MYSKINA (RUS) 4-6 6-3 3-6
1r 10-01-01 Moscow - Galina FOKINA (RUS) 2-6 6-1 2-6
1r 10-08-01 Stuttgart - Anne KREMER (LUX) 6-4 2-6 5-7
1r 10-15-01 Zurich - Amanda COETZER (RSA) 0-6 6-4 3-6
QF 10-22-01 Luxembourg - Kim CLIJSTERS (BEL) 5-7 6-7(2)

SF 12-31-01 Auckland
2r 01-07-02 Sydney
1r 01-15-02 OZ
SF 01-29-02 Tokyo
2r 02-04-02 Paris
2r 02-11-02 Antwerp
2r 02-18-02 Dubai

Anna have been in Memphis this week. She didn't HAVE to choose a tournament she knew would have 3 or 4 elite players in it. It's NOT inevitable she face a top ten player inthe 2nd round every week.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,493 Posts
Volcana said:
It's easy to be fooled by the quality of Anna's opponents. However, I view this year as an extension of Anna's post USOpen 2001. The results are the same. 1st and 2nd round losses with an ocassional semi. If I remove the names of her 2002 conquerers ....

Yeah makes real sense.. Results are the same.. so I suppose you have come to the conclusion that she is playing at the same level at the end of last year to this year..
The opponent does not make any difference does it???

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,274 Posts
Anna will gain confidence hopefully. Personally I think Alexandra right now is playing better then Anna is right now. I mean yeah Anna is a good player but imho she lacks that fire in her belly. ALex imho has that fire. ALex beat Jennifer and played Seles tough. I guess I am comparing Anna to ALex becasue they imho are both on an even keel sorda. Alot of people are stuck in this 97 version of Anna K. Just maybe she is the best player that she can possibly be. .. at the moment. maybe 97 was a fluke and this is the true Anna K.
 

·
R.I.P. Thank you!
Joined
·
25,876 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,599 Posts
There is no shame in playing lower tier events. Heck, if it will help your game, even challenger events should be an option. It appears that Anna thinks that she is too good to enter those tournaments. I believe that she should reconsider!:sad:
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top