Tennis Forum banner
1 - 20 of 28 Posts

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,972 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
1. (1) Alx 8164 :bowdown:
2. (2) Anabel 7243 :kiss:
3. (3) Sonfo 5192
4. (4) Mikey 4928
5. (5) WilliamsLover 4628
6. (6) Dokic Power 4211 :yawn:
7. (7) Petosp 3407
8. (8) ILT 3233
9. (9) Kournikovafan13 2485 :yawn:
10. (10) ASV 2397

11. (11) Ryan15 2114
12. (12) Steven 1953
13. (13) Joseosu19 1723
14. (18) Leena 1653 :nerner:
15. (19) Alexsydney 1493 :clap2:
16. (15) Elektra 1470
17. (14) Randy 1427 :help:
18. (20) Chrispy 1343
19. (16) Paul 1340 :yawn:
20. (17) Kkovafan 1327 :lol:
21. (22) VSfan1 1110
22. (21) Dokic Fan 1070 :yawn:
23. (23) DannyLovesMonica 777
24. (24) PolishProdigy 727
25. (25) Wojtek 611
26. (26) Babsifan 558
27. (27) Ajrob 505
28. (28) Wongqks 451
29. (29) Jordan 327
30. (30) Alberto 246
31. (31) Scotso 148
32. (32) Tennis124 131
33. (33) Kimmie's boy 128
34. (34) Canigetawhat 108
35. (35) Nike78uk 97
36. (36) Come-on-kim 83
37. (37) Sam L 67
37. (37) Koj-e 67
39. (45) Azza 64 :bigclap:
40. (39) Dario88 62
41. (43) Grafan 51
42. (40) Llieky 47
43. (41) TC 40
44. (42) Monicanna 27
45. (44) Lee-Waters Boy 7
46. (46) Jacs 3
47. (47) Tennista 3
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
It's impossible that I lost points.

My first tournament was Los Angeles last year, I didn't play between Stanford and San Diego, yet I lost over 200 points. And I won Los Angeles this year and lost in the final last year, so I still shouldn't be losing any points.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
Why? :angel:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
lol ;)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,972 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
If you didn't know... WTA drops points and add points of the same week.

San Diego this year was played the week LA was played last year, that's why San Diego adds points and Los Angeles'02 takes off.

1 more reason of why anyone but me will do ranks. :)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
San Diego 2002 was played from July 29 to August 4
San Diego 2003 was played from July 28 to August 3

Los Angeles 2002 was played from Ausgust 5 to August 11
Los Angeles 2003 was played from August 4 to August 10

1 more reason why you have to be double checked too :)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,972 Posts
Discussion Starter · #15 ·
Poor Mikey & Leena.

I follow WTA rules... but dear, if you check TTT schedule, you would see that we have 1 week more this year. And that's why schedule is 1 week behind.

I know what i do, and i do it well. Cant say the same about ... well seeing this.. oh whatever, night, im going.

:wavey:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
Exuse me? You were the one that JUST said that you follow the WTA calender exactly, that was what you original post said. I pointed out that the WTA calender says that you are mistaken. Don't try and change the subject by saying that you were actually following the TTT calender, because the TTT calender should be following the WTA calender anyway.

To quote an idiot I know: Geez.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
And even if you are following the TTT calender, then that's pretty ridiculous. We still took a week for Continental Cup last year, it just wasn't considered an actual week. This year it was actually inserted into the schedule.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,972 Posts
Discussion Starter · #18 ·
No what i said is that WTA drops the points of the week 17/8/02 and add poinst of the week 17/8/03. That was my point about WTA rules.

In TTT last year, the #30 week we had that in 2002 was played Los Angeles and in 2003 was played San Diego. So following WTA rules, i drop off Los Angeles and i add San Diego. End of the story.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,364 Posts
End of story. Nobody say anything else, this discussion is over and nothing else matters.

Weren't you leaving?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
16,972 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
Oh, and the only idiot here is you. Because people, you really have a big problem. Any of you can't have a conversation without making an insult.

Oh there is a world for this: inmature people. Ups! were two. Geez.
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top