Tennis Forum banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,377 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Greece d Italy 4-6 6-3 10-7<br />Spain d Argentina 4-6 7-5 10-5<br />Australia d Argentina 5-7 6-3 10-7<br />France d Belgium 1-6 6-3 10-6

The super-tiebreak system isn't fair IMO. The super-tiebreak has been won by the team that won the 2nd set all the time!! It seemslike this system isn't fair!<br />When a team has won the 2nd set, they are confident and playing better than in the 1st set. When there's a 3rd set, the team that won the 1st set can come back in the match, but when there's only a short super-tiebreak they are doomed to lose <img src="frown.gif" border="0">

I think they should try something else coz the S-TB obviously doesn't work well!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,217 Posts
You are right. It's not fair to the team that won the 1st set coz they can't get back into the match.
 

·
Miss Verstand
Joined
·
16,531 Posts
That is such nonsense. The tie break has nothing to do with the two previous sets, its a completely different thing and both teams have equal chances.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,198 Posts
I also think both reams have equal chances.<br />It's just a new start like the third set was a new start.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top