Tennis Forum banner

1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,514 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
The US Open first round prooves to me that Maria Sharapova is definately the better player of the two. I noticed all along that Karolina seemed to be doing well at the lower events, but then she wasn't playing well on anything other than clay, nor did she perform well at Roland Garros. Masha seems to perform much better at the big events, and from what I've seen, has more talent. My final evidence is that Sprem lost her US Open first round 6-3; 6-2 to a player she could at least hit toe to toe w/ . Masha WON her match 6-1; 6-1 to a player that was supposed to give her trouble by using different spins and retrieving to no end. What do you guys think?

GO MARIA!!!!! :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,950 Posts
i've never seen prem play so....
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
730 Posts
Maria is as talented as they come- aint seen sperm play but if she's meant to be more talented than maria where's the reults to prove it? Maria has been beating a few top players and taken a set of the world 1..
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
5,310 Posts
mboyle said:
The US Open first round prooves to me that Maria Sharapova is definately the better player of the two. I noticed all along that Karolina seemed to be doing well at the lower events, but then she wasn't playing well on anything other than clay, nor did she perform well at Roland Garros. Masha seems to perform much better at the big events, and from what I've seen, has more talent. My final evidence is that Sprem lost her US Open first round 6-3; 6-2 to a player she could at least hit toe to toe w/ . Masha WON her match 6-1; 6-1 to a player that was supposed to give her trouble by using different spins and retrieving to no end. What do you guys think?

GO MARIA!!!!! :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
I've never seen Karolina play so I can't compare them. By the way she didn't do well at Roland Garros because she didn't even play it ;) I don't now how Meghan played but Virginia really didn't have nothing to hurt Maria.
 

·
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
Joined
·
49,309 Posts
Karolina did so poorly at Roland Garros, she wasn't even in the draw. She couldn't play as she was still in the Final in Strasbourg.
 

·
I'm so current, I'm tomorrow.
Joined
·
49,309 Posts
Oh, and until they go head to head, I'll reserve judgment. Maria, technically, is the better player as she's ranked many places ahead of K-Lina.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,220 Posts
I can't really say, I haven't seen Šprem play yet. But on clay, I think Karolina at least stands a chance, given the results so far.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,315 Posts
This is a question? Sprem's fans seem to overrate her based primarily on challenger results. I'm sure she's a nice girl and all, but not top 10 material.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
596 Posts
if you are asking who is more talented,
there is a reason Maria is hailed as the next Anna,
while you dont see anyone saying
K-Lina following the footstep of Mijranda, or Iva:)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
18,514 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
I don't think I'd want to be hailed as the next Kournikova by the media:eek: . BTW croat, I think Masha is the better carpet player.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,842 Posts
I think some of you are being a little too hard at Sprem at this point. Her rapid rise in the rankings is due to the fact that although she is not ready for the top twenty, she definitely is one of THE most talented newcomers on the rise.

And come on people she did not even make the main draw of touraments until when? May?

She is a good player who has a chance to be a great player so give her a break. When she is ready to take that next step to be a bigger tennis player, you will know it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,792 Posts
villa said:
Maria is as talented as they come- aint seen sperm play but if she's meant to be more talented than maria where's the reults to prove it?
thats why i always type her name slowly ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,274 Posts
mboyle said:
The US Open first round prooves to me that Maria Sharapova is definately the better player of the two. I noticed all along that Karolina seemed to be doing well at the lower events, but then she wasn't playing well on anything other than clay, nor did she perform well at Roland Garros. Masha seems to perform much better at the big events, and from what I've seen, has more talent. My final evidence is that Sprem lost her US Open first round 6-3; 6-2 to a player she could at least hit toe to toe w/ . Masha WON her match 6-1; 6-1 to a player that was supposed to give her trouble by using different spins and retrieving to no end. What do you guys think?

GO MARIA!!!!! :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
You needed a first round match by maria to tell you this? Maria will trounce her back out of the open. Sorry spremy but theres a new girl in town and your in her way to the top ten.

bye bye

GO MARIA LIL VEE SHARAPOVA
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,271 Posts
Sprem lost to Shaugnessy who beat Venus, earlier this year on American Hardcourts.
Sharapova won against a non-specialist of harcourt player, Ruano Pascual. She won 6/1 6/1, but it spent 1 hour 14 minutes, because there were many deuces.
You definitely cannot compare !!!!!

But, I'm wondering if they ever playedd each other in a junior competition.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,950 Posts
the only way to find out who is better is to get them to play each other. but sharapova lately has performed better in the higher events than sprem (although sharapova hasn't played any small events and sprem's ranking is to low to get into the bigger events)
 
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top