Tennis Forum banner

1 - 20 of 39 Posts

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
7,996 Posts
no....she should be #2
 

·
Sabatini lover Forever
Joined
·
15,213 Posts
anton said:
She beat Serena there before and Venus has won 2 times. Serena only beat Venus because Venus had a sore shoulder.

I hope Venus can win and I believe she may not drop a set.
Complaining on a Venus lost :p ;)

Serena has beaten her last 5 times plain and simple.
No she should not be ahead Serena´s ranking points are way ahead from Venus, Kim maybe will be ranked number two when Wimbledon comes. But i think Venus has to be seeded 2 no matter what. But not Number one, she does not own it and does not deserves it either, RIGHT NOW.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,686 Posts
I agree petosp. Sore shoulder my ass, She was outplayed at Wimby, & USO , disagree, I don't care. The only time Venus played like shit against Serena is last years Miami. Check yourself anton.

Injury free Venus is what I want first and fore most. Seedings doesn't matter at the moment. :)
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,804 Posts
Discussion Starter #9
Mr. Man said:
I agree petosp. Sore shoulder my ass, She was outplayed at Wimby, & USO , disagree, I don't care. The only time Venus played like shit against Serena is last years Miami. Check yourself anton.

It would be awesome if Vee was seeded #2. But Injury free Venus is what I want first and fore most. Seedings doesn't matter at the moment. :)

Serena was the one who said Venus had a sore shoulder.
 

·
Sabatini lover Forever
Joined
·
15,213 Posts
anton said:
How far has Kim gotten at Wimbledon? I can't remember her ever doing well there.

Justine does well I remember but then she loses to a Williams sister. Justine shocked Jennifer the other year.
KIm 4th round 1999 losing to Graf and 2001 Qf losing to Davenport best results there
 

·
psychotic banana
Joined
·
3,022 Posts
based on last year's Wimbledon results, Venus should be seeded #2. If she wins this year, then she should be #1 come next year...imo
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,971 Posts
No, I don't agree with altering the seedings, the ranks are what they are for a reason they reflect how players are playing going into a tournament. So they should just go with the ranks, & before anyone says I'm only saying that cause I'm a Kim fan and wan her seeded higher, well that's wrong, if you were asking me if Kim should be seeded #1, I'd say no as well, it should go with the rankings.

Players work hard all year to get their rankings higher and to receive a higher seed should be a just reward for their ard work. If Wimbleodn tamper their seeds I think the French Open should too.
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
2,109 Posts
I agree with you....there aren't really any surface specialists on the womens side so its not like, it will make a difference in the big scheme of things, esp with the intro of 32 seeds.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
19,755 Posts
Isn't wimby the only slam that does not go by rankings alone, and by previous success on grass? If so Venus will get the #2 seed, and Serena will get the #1 seed this year. However, Venus shouldn't be seeded #1 at Wimby this year but hopefully she can get it next year.

Chill out Anton.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,384 Posts
mmcdonald said:
V should be seeded #2

but it wont matter, cause she'll win anyway ;)
easier said than done.;) especially if Serena is on the other side of the net. :worship:
 
1 - 20 of 39 Posts
Top