Tennis Forum banner

Should the Grand Slams be eliminated?

976 Views 32 Replies 16 Participants Last post by  -Sonic-
Since there is again a good chance that a non slam winner (or finalist for that matter) will end the year ranked number 1 over a winner of 2 slams. I ask the question why not eliminate the slams and have 52 weeks of Eastborne, Dohai, Dubai, Linz, LA, New Haven, Tokyo, etc.. Apparently winning titles with 1 or 2 top players is more important than winning a 2 week tournament with all the top players?
1 - 1 of 33 Posts
Better idea. The Australian Open has always been the "weaker cousin" in the Slams, so how about we cancel it and everyone just plays 3 tournaments a year?
1 - 1 of 33 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.