Separate forum 
Should PAW doubles have their own separate forum?
Hey PAW players,
I know most of you have realised that a keen team of PAW players have set up a PAW doubles competition, which I almightly support. They have done a great job in attracting players to play an interesting game.
However, the PAW forum has recently been crowded by threads both titled "PAW rankings" and since the majority of PAW players are just singles players, it's becoming confusing which thread is for doubles and which is for singles.
Of course the games are based on the same format of PAW, but PAW doubles have their own set of rankings and commitments and thus I thought it would be better if they had their own "PAW doubles" forum.
This poll can be voted by anyone, I just want to see what you think.
Thanks for reading,
SpikeyAidanm
P.S: This is by no means a criticism of the formation of PAW doubles, I fully support it, this is a thread intended to make it more efficient for PAW singles and doubles players to play their game. 
I know most of you have realised that a keen team of PAW players have set up a PAW doubles competition, which I almightly support. They have done a great job in attracting players to play an interesting game.
However, the PAW forum has recently been crowded by threads both titled "PAW rankings" and since the majority of PAW players are just singles players, it's becoming confusing which thread is for doubles and which is for singles.
Of course the games are based on the same format of PAW, but PAW doubles have their own set of rankings and commitments and thus I thought it would be better if they had their own "PAW doubles" forum.
This poll can be voted by anyone, I just want to see what you think.
Thanks for reading,
SpikeyAidanm
P.S: This is by no means a criticism of the formation of PAW doubles, I fully support it, this is a thread intended to make it more efficient for PAW singles and doubles players to play their game.
