Yes, it should read that Serena played at only 20%*disposablehero said:Given that people love to give asterisks next to titles when certain top players are absent, seems only fair given that the 2 best players in the world right now were not in the field.
Kim 0 Slams, Serena 6? Are you suggesting that Martina Navratilova is one of the top 2 players in the world right now?mboyle said:Let's see:
Kim Clijsters vs. Serena Williams
Grand Slam Titles: 0 6
Grand Slam Finals: 4 7
Weeks at 1: 17? 50 something
JHH I'll give you, but Kim never was a top two or three player. No. 4 or 5, yes. The rankings also said Martina Hingis was no. 1 for two straight years without winning a slam, and while holding a losing record to most or all of the top ten.:tape:
what two slams??VS Fan said:No asterisk, Serena played well, but lost. Kim and Justine had TWO slams to compete in with NO Williams present. This is different whether you can see it or not.
If Kim or Justine were there, Serena would probably STILL have been there, so NO asterisk.