thanks yous so muches...go Andy, James, Andre and Juanquimishar said:You have to be incredibly biased to see some dramatic difference between the game of Younes and the game of Roddick. They both rely on huge serves and huge forehands. They're both pretty scrappy, get a lot of balls back. Younes has a great slice backhand which he uses very effectively, Andy can come over his backhand or slice it, both moderately effective. They're both pretty good at the net. They're both very competitive. Younes is more creative with his shots. Andy has a fantastic second serve.
The rest is just hysteria.
Big double standard right there.mishar said:Everyone loves it when their favorite players (Goran, Younes) shows emotion on the court, pulls the crowd in it, but if they don't like someone (like Andy) then it's terrible. I don't see the difference between what Roddick did and what Younes did. Obviously there's more hype about Roddick, but the crowd was chanting Younes' name as well.
But I would love it if Younes won the whole thing!!