Let's just take that number, 46,000, that was about 0.5% of Englands population at the time, not sure why the other 99.5% are tarred with the same brush, the point I'm making is most people from the country that these slave traders come from, had nothing to do with trading slaves.It’s true that black Africans sold others into slavery, but to say that only a tiny fraction of the British population participated is untrue. I read that 46,000 British owned slaves in the 1800s when the practice was abolished, and this figure probably doesn’t even count those of British descent who owned Africans in the USA and other countries. Just look at all the British/Irish/Scottish surnames given to blacks in the USA and the Caribbean (including mine, which is Stewart). In USA at one point, somewhere between 30-50% of white southerners owned slaves, and they were not all elite. Many were middle-class descendants of whites from the British Isles. Black Africans definitely contributed to the practice of slavery, but the vast majority of people who got rich off the practice were white men, regardless of how you slice it. The British government even gave a bail out to the thousands of British who owned slaves when the practice was abolished in the early 1800s in Britain.
People complain about the agendas pushed by some protesters, but in this country protest is the way to get results. In the case of Ahmaud Arbery, the guys who murdered him were not going to be charged originally, and they were arrested only after the video went viral and people began to protest. Same in the case for Floyd. Yes, there will always be people who take advantage of protests, but those people in no way make me lose the message or confuse it. I know darn well there’s no way I could have the freedom to vote, have access to public parks and other amenities, marry whomever I want, or go to white schools if it weren’t for protesters who accomplished so much in the 1950s-60s. Protests get results.
.What an utterly dumb reductive nonsense are you spewing?
It's like saying because a tiny (hundred or so) people work in London's Stock Exchange, the stock market has nothing to do any body else's life. Absurd.
Slavery wasn't just a hobby of some random plantation in the new world, it was an industry and economy on both sides of the Atlantic. Whole cities and towns in England itself were built upon it (never mind the colonies), Cities like London, Liverpool, Southhampton, Bristol and so on and so forth flourished and exploded out of their tiny medieval walls. For example Bristol was a small town before it hosted the first slave ship. Then it transformed into the 5th largest city in the country. In other words the economy of slavery affected far more individuals than those directly involved in the process. So no, it wasn't just a "tiny fraction". You completely missed the mark by a long shot.
You're also wrong about the numbers. Western transatlantic slave trade transported more slaves than Arabs did. Slaves were trickling into the middle east whereas Europeans surpassed them in efficiency by stuffing slaves full of huge ships. The dingy tiny Arab boats were microscopic compared to the bay size of cargo galleons with three or four masts.
On one hand you admit cities and countries were built with blood money, then absurdly go on to say the people in those places have "jack all to do" with their blood stained benefiting. You cant' have it both ways. If you benefited from slavery then you DO have something to do with slavery.who said cities were not built on blood money? nobody, I said that number of people who were involved from Britain in terms of being responsible for the slave trade, were tiny in comparison to the population of Britain, vast majority of the British population at that time, had jack all to do with the slave trade, they were mostly peasants. The Elite, the one's who were responsible for organising and funding this act were a tiny % of the people that made up Britain at that time, nobody is arguing cities did not benefit.
As I said, The 46,000 number doesn’t encompass all of the British/Irish/Scottish who enslaved Africans in USA, the Caribbean, and South America. A sizable amount of white Southerners owned slaves, and many of those owners were from the British Isles. As Raiden said, whole economies were built on slave labor. The reason the British are often “tarred” is because the corruption was so widespread. They had slaves and colonies all around the world. It’s impossible to implement something like that and be so successful using just a fraction of people.Let's just take that number, 46,000, that was about 0.5% of Englands population at the time, not sure why the other 99.5% are tarred with the same brush, the point I'm making is most people from the country that these slave traders come from, had nothing to do with trading slaves.
I'm not against protests per se but, in the UK the media are distancing themselves from the Black lives movement because it's politically motivated with accusations of donated money being given to democratic party.
why do you struggle to understand this, it's really not difficult.On one hand you admit cities and countries were built with blood money, then absurdly go on to say the people in those places have "jack all to do" with their blood stained benefiting. You cant' have it both ways. If you benefited from slavery then you DO have something to do with slavery.
If a burglar stole an art piece and sells it to me. I can't pretend to have nothing to do with the case just cuz I myself didn't steal it and even had no idea the piece was stolen. Facts are facts and the fact is I now have this fucking stolen property lying in my house. Therefore by definition I have something to do with the crime.
Ignorance is NEVER an excuse.
blm given raised money to political parties not the other way around.As I said, The 46,000 number doesn’t encompass all of the British/Irish/Scottish who enslaved Africans in USA, the Caribbean, and South America. A sizable amount of white Southerners owned slaves, and many of those owners were from the British Isles. As Raiden said, whole economies were built on slave labor. The reason the British are often “tarred” is because the corruption was so widespread. They had slaves and colonies all around the world. It’s impossible to implement something like that and be so successful using just a fraction of people.
No clue what point you’re making about Black Lives Matter being politically motivated. Most protest movements are motivated by politics, but that fact alone doesn’t devalue those movements.
the UK government only recently finished paying back loans taken to compensate slave owners. so that means any british person who paid taxes to until the year 2015 must be complicit. all non-tax-dodging british people are cancelled!Let's just take that number, 46,000, that was about 0.5% of Englands population at the time, not sure why the other 99.5% are tarred with the same brush, the point I'm making is most people from the country that these slave traders come from, had nothing to do with trading slaves
I’d say they are previously banned posters, like the troll monri2020 who I now have on ignore. It’s only a matter of time before they get banned again.I find it funny how all these "new" accounts started popping up and didn't start commenting until these racial injustices started, and for them to start pushing "racism" is a myth agenda, so that they can stay in their privilege.
See this is what happens with the far-left - instead of rational debate, anyone who disagrees with them is just labelled a bigot, transphobe, homophobe etc... all that rubbishI’d say they are previously banned posters, like the troll monri2020 who I now have on ignore. It’s only a matter of time before they get banned again.
This is the movement with which arguing is counterproductive and dangerous.Labeling names is oldschool, they are now "banning" people with a bullet to the head
And of course you won't see anything about this case on the twitter feed of otherwise devoted SJWs in the likes of "Osaka, Gauff and others"![]()
Young Mother Shot and Killed By Black Lives Matter Protester After Saying 'All Lives Matter'
A 24-year-old mother was killed in Indianapolis last week by a Black Lives Matter protester, allegedly for saying “All lives matter.”newspunch.com
there is no proven information yet so what do you expect the major networks have not even picked it up the boyfriend is lying .... it’s more to itLabeling names is oldschool, they are now "banning" people with a bullet to the head
And of course you won't see anything about this case on the twitter feed of otherwise devoted SJWs in the likes of "Osaka, Gauff and others"![]()
Young Mother Shot and Killed By Black Lives Matter Protester After Saying 'All Lives Matter'
A 24-year-old mother was killed in Indianapolis last week by a Black Lives Matter protester, allegedly for saying “All lives matter.”newspunch.com
Candice is on the wrong side of history just to generate money and be a Devil's advocate.Society needs more young blacks who are willing and courageous enough to speak against the Left's tyranny and identity politics, like Candance Owens does.