Tennis Forum banner

Naomi Osaka Has The Chance To Create Tennis History : 1st Withdrawn Player To Be Reinstated During Tounament To Win WTA Title

12K views 161 replies 57 participants last post by  MamboJig  
#1 · (Edited)
Would be so 2020....

Naomi Osaka confirmed in her statement that she pulled out of the tournament YESTERDAY whilst matches were still in play.

The WTA almost certainly bent the rules and made an exception here.

I for one agree and support Naomi’s reasons to withdraw. But think it should have been handled better... As the rules surely need to be respected and adhered too no matter what?


I pulled out of the tournament yesterday

It’s pretty clear cut...


 
#3 ·
Lmao. I still wonder if she might reconsider her decision to play once she gets wind of the inevitable blowback. But if not she's by far the favorite to win the title. Can't imagine the other players would be thrilled if that's how things unfold. The USTA board or whoever calls the shots should be completely cleaned out :rolleyes:
 
#7 ·
She hasn't. What I'm guessing is that she told them she was withdrawing, told them why, and then they got on their knees, kissed the hem of her garment and convinced her to settle for a Day of Protest instead of withdrawal, and she relented.
 
#5 ·
Would be so 2020....

Naomi Osaka confirmed in her statement that she pulled out of the tournament YESTERDAY whilst matches were still in play.

The WTA almost certainly bent the rules and made an exception here.

I for one agree and support Naomi’s reasons to withdraw. But think it should have been handled better... As the rules surely need to be respected and adhered too?
The WTA and USTA should be the ones getting the blame and hate but unfortunately they'll all be directed at Naomi.

Can't blame her for the rules bending by the authorities but it is what it is.
 
#8 ·
Would be so 2020....

Naomi Osaka confirmed in her statement that she pulled out of the tournament YESTERDAY whilst matches were still in play.

The WTA almost certainly bent the rules and made an exception here.

I for one agree and support Naomi’s reasons to withdraw. But think it should have been handled better... As the rules surely need to be respected and adhered too no matter what?
Which rule exactly? I'm sure there is a formal way to withdraw and a twitter post to your own page likely isn't one of them.

Osaka clearly did intent to withdraw from her match and after discussing it with the WTA/USTA/tournament organizers she decided not to.
 
#74 ·
When you know your worth, you make it work for you. I'm not worried about Naomi's resolve! She's canned Sasha when they had just won slams together. She's about principle. This young lady here, doesn't play when it comes to standing up for what she believes in. That's called backbone people!
Errr, except she is playing. She made a very strong statement that she was not going to play on principle and the fact that she has now gone back on that doesn't sit well with me. I really respected her for what she said and what we all beleved she was going to do, but now it just looks like empty virtue signalling. I think she made a big mistake here.
 
#17 ·
A player can say "I'm done" to the on-court umpire and it will be considered a 6-3 4-1 ret. or something but there has to be something specific for an off-court withdrawal to be considered valid otherwise the WTA/USTA are making themselves vulnerable to a lawsuit although Mertens doesn't look to be a "I will see you in court" type of person.
 
#21 ·
If only Bouchard was in the draw to lead a class action 😂 . For real though, Mertens isn't the only one affected by this change, even an ATP doubles player should be allowed to sue them IMO. But I doubt anyone wants the bad press/cares enough.
 
#22 ·
The player herself is quoted as saying she pulled out of the tournament yesterday...

I don’t know what the issue is here?

This isn't even meant to be a shady thread, it’s just plain facts that Osaka withdrew and the WTA made an exception to let her back in as the circumstance was unique and unprecedented.
 
#28 ·
Would be so 2020....

Naomi Osaka confirmed in her statement that she pulled out of the tournament YESTERDAY whilst matches were still in play.

The WTA almost certainly bent the rules and made an exception here.

I for one agree and support Naomi’s reasons to withdraw. But think it should have been handled better... As the rules surely need to be respected and adhered too no matter what?


I pulled out of the tournament yesterday

It’s pretty clear cut...


No. From what I understand, the USTA cancelled play today in Hope's Naomi would change her mind and then it comes out she in fact did.......after they spoke to her. She said "at their request".
 
#30 ·
And where is exactly the difference between deciding not to play and withdrawing ? imo she shouldn't play, even if they gave her the chance. She shouldn't wonder if her decision raises some eyebrows and her motivations are questioned. Once you make a move concerning a political/social issue at least you gotta stay firm. With this she's toppled herself down from the moral pedestal, especially when it looks like the rules have been bent and she's the one ending up receiving the priviliged treatment.
 
#33 ·
There's a huge difference between breaking the rules and not. It's not just semantics.

Her motivations are not in question at all. Her protest led to a full cancellation of matches for a day in solidarity. She is raising awareness. That is what she wanted to do and that is what she accomplished. You have to understand that it is because of the protest and delayed matches that she is playing again.
 
#45 ·
Honestly @MalJackson & @Power Shot:
You ranting over the Rules is quite amusing & hilarious!

We should all cherish that the ATP/WTA paused their play for one Day.

Naomi Osaka accomplished what she wanted!

It would have been really bad optics for the ATP/WTA/USTA continue to keep playing today while every other Major Sports in the USA is paused and Games got postponed & rescheduled.

Osaka did the right thing and so did the ATP/WTA Tours in collaboration with the USTA!
 
#54 ·
Let me say this one more time: Naomi NEVER formally withdrew. She announced her intention to withdraw and when the USTA, WTA and the tournament got wind of this, they decided to postpone play in hopes she would change her mind.

They then scheduled a meeting with her and, as her statement on reversing her decision says, "at their request", she decided to play. She DIDN'T want to. She did it because THEY wanted her to. She plainly said that.

There's no rule-bending going on. It's a simple decision that, after consultation, she changed. That's how it happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shifty-Eyed Dog
#64 ·
There is paperwork involved in withdrawing from a pro tournament. A Twitter statement isn't sufficient. She may have declared an intention to withdraw
If that's the case, Osaka should be fined according to the WTA rulebook.
This is what the rulebook says:
"Any player who publicly announces a withdrawal from a Tournament prior to submitting her official withdrawal to the WTA in accordance with this Section IV.A.1 will be fined for Dishonorable or Unprofessional Conduct under the Code of Conduct."