Somehow, some people seem to think getting endorsement deals is some right that comes with winning tennis matches. It isn't.
Commercial sponsors obviously select "spokespeople: who they think will sell the product. And that usually means people who appeal to the demographic they are trying to reach.
Most commercial sponsors would make deals with the devil if they thought it would "move the product."
Those who think Navratilova is hampered more by her age than by her sexual preferences are probably right on the money. Forty-six year old women, gay or straight, don't get the attention of consumers the way the young and the nubile do.
I'm not praising that. I think it stinks. But that's the way the world operates.
Fans of Lindsay Davenport often complained she didn't get her share of endorsements either, while Anna Kournikova became very rich.
Davy is straight, so that can't be the issue. Its exposure, appeal and presentation that seem to make the difference.
Also, one last thing that works against Martina N. Ask yourself this. How many commercials have you seen Monica Seles in? How many commercials in America did you see Graf in?
In truth, non-Americans have a hard time lining up commercial work in America. Anyone with even a trace of an accent also finds problems, if it is a speaking role in a TV spot.
Hingis has made a fortune doing commercials. They include work for Bolle, Omega, Sanex, Clairol, Ocean Spray, Opel, American Express, Merril Lynch, etc, as well as for the obvious tennis related ones, including Yonex and Adidas. But how many of those ads have you seen in America? Most of her commercials and ads run in Europe and Asia, not in America.