Venus is in a no win situation with some people. If she wins the USO this year, then she won it because Serena wasn't there. If she loses, then she just doen't have it any more. So I guess she would be better off if she did one of the following:Sam L said:It's really funny how you guys turn these situations around to suit your arguments.
Of course Kim has more to prove in career, at every slam, Venus has achieved more. WE ALREADY KNOW THAT.
The initial point about proving comes from the fact that since there was NO Serena at the US Open, who should win it. Who is most likely to win it. And there you can't argue that it's Venus since she's lost 5 slams to her. Kim has lost to Justine and Venus in her last two slams, what's she got to prove? Even if there's no Serena, somebody can easily beat her.
But Venus has to prove that without Serena, she can easily win this slam, otherwise, we all know that she's not winning GS, not because of Serena, but because her overall level of play has fallen since two years ago.
If you guys want to switch words and sentences around, and play the grammar game and live in denial, go ahead.
Withdraw from the open