Tennis Forum banner

1 - 20 of 56 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
21,902 Posts
considering that they are not too many high ranked players in her half of the draw and she gets bye in the first round, it's probably true.

but it is still possible:

for getting to the semis 135 points
if she defeats Ruano Pascual in the second round 10 points
if she defeats Shaughnessy in the third round 23 points
if she defeats Myskina in the QF round 35 points

Total 203 points

But I'm looking at the best case scenario: no upsets in her part of the draw and she wins all the matches.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,315 Posts
Well, worst case scenario is she doesn't get it. She'll still have a shot ar the RG title anyhow, and virtual mortal certainty of the 2 seed for Wimbledon.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,270 Posts
Worse case scenario she'll be in the half that Venus and Serena are in. Kim won't get the #2 seed. Venus can be ranked #3 but still get the #2 seed she has played better at Wimbeldon than Kim.
 
  • Like
Reactions: selesfan1

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
2,109 Posts
......Does RG adjust there seedings...didnt' think they did. I know they can, just never heard of them doing it. I personally hope they stick with the rankings.....For Vee to win she has got to go through Serena most likely anyway so to me it doesn't really matter.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,270 Posts
RG goes prety much by seedings but Wimbeldon does whatever they feel like. LOL

They usually go by past wins on the famous grass courts. I just can't see them seeding Kim over Venus on grass. Imho if Venus is ranked #3 she will still be seeded #2 at Wimbeldon.
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
2,109 Posts
Ahhh ok..I thought you were talking about RG....I agree about Wimbledon though they probably will adjust Venus' seed.
 

·
Adrenaline junkie
Joined
·
23,020 Posts
Wimbledon adjusts men's seedings a lot. With women the changes are usually minimal albeit sometimes strange. I remember last year they bumped someone ( I think it was Raymond ) by like 10 places with no apparent reason..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,270 Posts
ys, minimal to what? maybe 5 or 10 years BEFORE Venus and Serena came around but they will do Venus just like they did Pete. Men's were messed with cause of Pete and other grass players who dominated.

Question? Did Steffie get a higher seed on grass but had a lower rank? Also prior to Venus Williams's 2 slams wins and a final who else on the WTA has dominated on grass the past 5 years or so?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,804 Posts
Kim does not deserve the #2 seed at Paris or London.

If Kim beats Venus in Paris, then she still does not deserve it because Venus is THE ONLY player to win Wimbledon TWICE which is something Serena has not done.

As a matter of fact I would like to see Venus seeded #1 at Wimbledon! GO VENUS!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
15,270 Posts
anton I thought the same thing.. Venus should get the top seed. Serena though is just too dominate in winning slams to overlook. So she'll get the #1 seed where as Vee will get #2.

unless Wimbeldon... shows their "true colors" and we all know they love "white".
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
7,804 Posts
Dawn Marie said:
anton I thought the same thing.. Venus should get the top seed. Serena though is just too dominate in winning slams to overlook. So she'll get the #1 seed where as Vee will get #2.

unless Wimbeldon... shows their "true colors" and we all know they love "white".

Dawn remember didnt they refuse to seed Lori McNeil(who had won a lot of grass matches and volleys very well) but then she took Steffi out in the first round?
 

·
Adrenaline junkie
Joined
·
23,020 Posts
Dawn Marie said:
ys, minimal to what? maybe 5 or 10 years BEFORE Venus and Serena came around but they will do Venus just like they did Pete. Men's were messed with cause of Pete and other grass players who dominated.

Question? Did Steffie get a higher seed on grass but had a lower rank? Also prior to Venus Williams's 2 slams wins and a final who else on the WTA has dominated on grass the past 5 years or so?
It doesn't matter , Dawn.. They do not usually adjust women due to different reason. Unlike men, there are much less surface specialists in women's tennis. There are no players, who are, say, great on grass and crap on other surfaces. Therefore , no real need to adjust..
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,843 Posts
Dawn Marie said:
anton I thought the same thing.. Venus should get the top seed. Serena though is just too dominate in winning slams to overlook. So she'll get the #1 seed where as Vee will get #2.

unless Wimbeldon... shows their "true colors" and we all know they love "white".
Dawn... don't get your hopes up for Wimbledon. The only top 10 adjustment they've ever made was for Steffi (from #3 to #2), who was a seven-time champion coming off an emotional RG win. If Venus is #3, she probably won't have won RG and is only a two-time champion. Anyway, the Steffi adjustment completely backfired when the player they bumped down - Lindsay - beat Steffi in the final, so they probably won't want to do that again.

They also adjusted Lisa Raymond and Alex Stevenson up that year (and not Tammy Tanasugarn!), which was a bit odd.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
4,078 Posts
sartrista7 said:
Dawn... don't get your hopes up for Wimbledon. The only top 10 adjustment they've ever made was for Steffi
That's not true.

Dawn, better prepare yourself for the reality that Venus will be ranked #4 by the time wimbledon rolls around. ;) :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
17,731 Posts
Well I just wish Kim the best of luck! I just hope she can get the no.2 seed in RG!!
 

·
Enemy of Art
Joined
·
14,039 Posts
Discussion Starter #18
King Lindsay said:
That's not true.
It's not true. Off the top of my head...in 1999, Pierce was ranked 8 and Tauziat was ranked 9, but they inverted those rankings (for pivotal seeding changes).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,957 Posts
If you've seen Kims half of the draw for the Italian Open you'd see that she will be in the final on Sunday. As for Wimbeldon Venus will be seeded above Clijsters due to both their records on grass - Kim pretty bad record and Venus has a great record. Actually Kim mighn't even be ranked 3 as Justine has done very well at Wimbeldon the last 2 years. It seems fair to me as there are very good grass court players eg Novotna and then there's someone like Monica whose game doesn't adapt very well to the surface even thogh she got to the quarters last year.
 

·
Veelieve!!!
Joined
·
32,533 Posts
King Lindsay said:
That's not true.

Dawn, better prepare yourself for the reality that Venus will be ranked #4 by the time wimbledon rolls around. ;) :D
I'm personally not stressing about Venus 's rank... She was #5 when she won in 2000, so all is good :p
 
1 - 20 of 56 Posts
Top