And for a good reason: WTA wanted to attract more singles players to do doubles.I understand when the partner complains but she lost her match fair and square. She shouldn’t give a fuck about what her opponents do later.
Next.
In any case it would be WTA fault since they changed the entry rules for doubles allowing singles players do this
It's kind of embarrassing for her as a doubles specialist ngl, but at the same time it's so disrespectful what singles players are doing to the doubles tour.
Yes they are much better players than the ITF scrubs who try to make a living from doubles. But that doesn't excuse playing 1-2 rounds for practice and shits and giggles, beating struggling players, then withdrawing to prioritize singles after having had their fun in doubles. They are so out of touch with the rest of the tour. The WTA needs to have some rules in place to prevent this.
It’s very easy. Use doubles ranking to enter like before. It’s WTA’s fault also the brainless scheduling with so many 2 weeks tournamentsIt's kind of embarrassing for her as a doubles specialist ngl, but at the same time it's so disrespectful what singles players are doing to the doubles tour.
Yes they are much better players than the ITF scrubs who try to make a living from doubles. But that doesn't excuse playing 1-2 rounds for practice and shits and giggles, beating struggling players, then withdrawing to prioritize singles after having had their fun in doubles. They are so out of touch with the rest of the tour. The WTA needs to have some rules in place to prevent this.
Couldn't they just tank their (next) match instead? Almost similar result as withdrawing before that match.There is a very easy fix for this: ban players who enter doubles and then withdraw from going on to further participate in the singles of that tournament.
But they are 🤷 Erin, our former #1 didn't even try to play singles. Those few top 50 ranked singles players are also top ranked doubles players and they are much better than those wannabe doubles specialists.All singles players used to play doubles, and even today there are many high-ranked singles players that play doubles. And at the slams some play mixed as well.
Most of the doubles players today are also working to move up the singles rankings, so they don't see themselves as exclusively "doubles specialists." And the more matches they can get after losing in the singles are valuable both as match time and the paltry money made playing doubles.
For those on this forum who think a "doubles specialist" are inferior players just watch how embarrassing it is to see "Tsitibosa" play a real doubles team at one of the slams. I'm laughing while they embarrass themselves.
Everyone here knew these two (Badosa/Muchova) were just grabbing the limelight and getting some "match practice time," and that they would withdraw.
Pegula still plays doubles, and she wouldn't withdraw. Sabablenka and Swiatek played doubles for a number of years until they wanted to exclusively focus on singles. They wouldn't enter a tournament and leave after the first round. I think they have more respect for the game and traditions of the game.
I'm sorry, but Khromacheva has a point, and I'm glad she aired it. It's a discussion that needs to be had. This has the residue of stink of Emma abandoning Murray at Wimbledon. It's selfish and self-serving.
Forget rules: how 'bout some basic etiquette.
And for you people who diss doubles, you're just not serious tennis people.
Navarro's problem is Fraudial activities. A top ten player playing a challenger is like Federer defeating Serena to win his 21th slam.Navarro takes my place in the 125k.