I think it's true for just about every player in history that they have a preferred style of play, based around their own strengths and weaknesses, which they then adapt to different surfaces. Any player that slides or hits with more topspin on clay or hits with more slice on grass is being versatile. The greater a player's skill set, of course, the more options they have. So a player whose modus operandi is to belt the cover off the ball from the back of the court every time will be less versatile than one who has the skill to favour topsin on clay and slice on grass.My contention is that all active players play the same way on all surfaces. They have "their game" and that's what they stick to. In fact this is also true on the ATP. Thoughts?
Nadal lost a set yesterday "because" of rain. Go figure. :spit:My contention is that all active players play the same way on all surfaces. They have "their game" and that's what they stick to. In fact this is also true on the ATP. Thoughts?
Btw, this is COMPLETELY false for the ATP.My contention is that all active players play the same way on all surfaces. They have "their game" and that's what they stick to. In fact this is also true on the ATP. Thoughts?
I disagree with you on all these points.Btw, this is COMPLETELY false for the ATP.
Biggest example is how Nadal drastically changes his game from clay to grass to hardcourts. You're not going to see him several meters behind the baseline at Wimbledon.
In order to be successful in the men's game, you actually can't play the same way on all surfaces. It just doesn't work.
Why?I disagree with you on all these points.
I concur plus he serves diferently on diferent surfaces.Btw, this is COMPLETELY false for the ATP.
Biggest example is how Nadal drastically changes his game from clay to grass to hardcourts. You're not going to see him several meters behind the baseline at Wimbledon.
In order to be successful in the men's game, you actually can't play the same way on all surfaces. It just doesn't work.
Integrity? Insanity? Intrigue? - take your pick. :lol:Why?
I think the picture below is interesting, it's taken from last year's ATP finals, still early in the match (3-2*) when both players were still in the match. The surface was fast hard courts and Nadal was hitting majority of balls deep behind baseline. He doesn't change his game as drastically as you seem to suggest.Btw, this is COMPLETELY false for the ATP.
Biggest example is how Nadal drastically changes his game from clay to grass to hardcourts. You're not going to see him several meters behind the baseline at Wimbledon.
In order to be successful in the men's game, you actually can't play the same way on all surfaces. It just doesn't work.