Tennis Forum banner

1 - 20 of 40 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
697 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
This very well may be an ignorant thread, however I noticed that Wimbledon bumped Federer's seeding from 3rd to 2nd which is a huge difference and Anderson's (who was the finalist last year) from 8th to 4th. This also happened last year with Raonic and Djokovic who got bumped from 23rd to 12th, making his draw significantly easier and he ended up winning. I'm well aware this is not a new thing and I can trace back examples as early as 2004, but this has probably been going on for longer.

On the other hand, no changes have been made for female players. Serena remains the 11th seed despite being in the top 8 based on Wimbledon's grass formula, Goerges is still 18th and Ostapenko is unseeded (They made the SF last year). I realize they have made exceptions in the past with Serena, Venus, Maria, etc. but it doesn't seem as consistent as on the ATP.

Can anyone tell me is there logical reasoning behind this or is it simply "tradition" and if it is, how is this fair? :rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
84,754 Posts
You should direct this question to Wimbledon, I suppose you'd get the answer you'd want rather than the posters in the forum discussing and speculating the reasons behind.:shrug: :eek:h:
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
77,403 Posts
Can anyone tell me is there logical reasoning behind this or is it simply "tradition" and if it is, how is this fair? :rolleyes:
They use formula to reshuffle seeds for men. Current ranking plus 100% of points on grass for the preceding 52 weeks plus 75% of points of the best result on grass the previous year. Federer got the second seed position thanks to his win in Halle.

It's a compromise that was agreed in 2001 after a fight between players and AELTC. Before that organizers could do whatever they wanted with the seeds.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
173 Posts
There's a specific formula that they use for men's seeds, not sure why they don't use the same system for women:

Since 2002 a seeding committee has not been required for the Gentlemen's Singles following an agreement with the ATP. While the seeds are still the top 32 players according to rankings, the seeding order is determined using the formula: ATP Entry System Position points + 100% points earned for all grass court tournaments in the past 12 months + 75% points earned for the best grass court tournament in the 12 months before that
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,618 Posts
There's a specific formula that they use for men's seeds, not sure why they don't use the same system for women:
There's a Williams family formula.

Would they do that this year when Serena's hardly finished a tournament? Svitolina's likely to get the 8th seed spot but nobody thinks she'll make the quarters.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
9,387 Posts
There's a Williams family formula.

Would they do that this year when Serena's hardly finished a tournament? Svitolina's likely to get the 8th seed spot but nobody thinks she'll make the quarters.
There is no Williams family formula.
There are two Williams Sisters who, between them, have won 12 of the last 19 championships, and have, at least one of them, appeared in 15 of the last 19 finals.
Stop casting their achievement through your twisted lens of imagined ill-procedure.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,977 Posts
Didnt they used to just give seedings to good grass courters before that was judged by a committee. Then the spanish claycourters boycotted the event which led to them using the seeding formula and would only shuffle the top 32 seeds. I am sure this was the reason the seeds became 32 in the first place.

No boycott occurred in WTA though. They still do it through a seeding committee.
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
77,403 Posts
Didnt they used to just give seedings to good grass courters before that was judged by a committee. Then the spanish claycourters boycotted the event which led to them using the seeding formula and would only shuffle the top 32 seeds. I am sure this was the reason the seeds became 32 in the first place.

No boycott occurred in WTA though. They still do it through a seeding committee.
Yes. Bump up certain players and bump down others (like Muster, Bruguera etc.).

All four slams have the right to decide their own seeds. It's just that other three never use that right and follow the official rankings.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,449 Posts
There is no Williams family formula.
There are two Williams Sisters who, between them, have won 12 of the last 19 championships, and have, at least one of them, appeared in 15 of the last 19 finals.
Stop casting their achievement through your twisted lens of imagined ill-procedure.
Bravo !!!
Until another set of sisters achieve the same, the Williams sisters should be praised.
We know all the haters are canvasing for Trump 2020.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
31,043 Posts
Unclear why they don't use the grass formula on the women's side. They do bump seeds though if you claim to be Wonder Woman, as we learned last year.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,812 Posts
They think the women are more even (they generally are) than the men who had more clay-court specialists - especially about 15 years ago.

But anyway - at least they haven't gone to the 16-seeds the Slams were supposed to be considering a year or two back.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,152 Posts
They will try everything to have Federer end up winning it, even just for the last time.
Yes! Of course! Because he was already a force when they created that rule. :rolleyes:

It was actually more likely the rule was created for Sampras' benefit.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,618 Posts
Yes! Of course! Because he was already a force when they created that rule. :rolleyes:

It was actually more likely the rule was created for Sampras' benefit.
It was mainly created after pressure from claycourt specialists, as prior to the formula being approved Wimbledon were adjusting seeding by committee (introducing human bias). The number of seeds was increased to 32 at the same time.

This ensured that the top 32 ranked players would all be seeded with only the positions altered according to a mathematically transparent formula. The rule is supposed to apply across all 4 slams though I'm not sure the others do this.

The ATP opposed it and wanted seedings solely via their rankings. The WTA also wanted that, though they recently changed things for players returning from maternity leave. I don't think that affects any competitor this year so the seedings to be announced tomorrow will be the best 32 players by ranking in order.

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/tennis/wimbledon-change-seeding-system-9249997.html
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
84,931 Posts
 
1 - 20 of 40 Posts
Top