.. what are the most important tournaments, outside of the slams?
By 'development', I mean,
Among the Tier I's, Miami is theoldest, most prestigious WTA event. At one time, it offered more prize money than OZ or the French.
Moscow, given the preponderance of Russian players on tour, is going to be an important event for at least the next decade.
The Indian market could pump an awful lot of money into the tour. So it would be nice if Kolkata or Bangalore survived and thrived.
Same logic as to the importance of Beijing.
Rome is the premier WTA red clay event, and pretty prestigious in it's own right.
Toray Pan Pacific gets historically weak fields, but there's an awful lot of investment money in that part of the world.
Similarly, Charleston is a really nice venue for sponsors. Tennis-wise, I don't see losing it hurting, but you have to keep the money happy.
Speaking of which, either Dubai or Doha.
And Bogota, by default, since it's only tournament in South America. How is that even possible? They produce quality tennis players, and there isn't even a Tier V besides besides Bogota?
OTOH, if we lost one out of Indian Wells, or San Diego, or the Canadian Open, it doesn't do the tour all that much damage. I don't think losing Zurich or Berlin would do too much damage either. I'm NOT saying these events are unimportant. Just that the impact of them being cancelled outright would be relatively minimal to the tour as a whole.
These aren't comprehensive lists, nor am I committed to those choices. Just interested in launching the discussion.
By 'development', I mean,
- TV contracts, either Network, or 'standard package' cable (in other words, you don;t pay extra for it.)
- bigger crowds at tournaments
- higher TV ratings
- bigger prize money
- Faster, stronger, more skilled, better trained players
Among the Tier I's, Miami is the
Moscow, given the preponderance of Russian players on tour, is going to be an important event for at least the next decade.
The Indian market could pump an awful lot of money into the tour. So it would be nice if Kolkata or Bangalore survived and thrived.
Same logic as to the importance of Beijing.
Rome is the premier WTA red clay event, and pretty prestigious in it's own right.
Toray Pan Pacific gets historically weak fields, but there's an awful lot of investment money in that part of the world.
Similarly, Charleston is a really nice venue for sponsors. Tennis-wise, I don't see losing it hurting, but you have to keep the money happy.
Speaking of which, either Dubai or Doha.
And Bogota, by default, since it's only tournament in South America. How is that even possible? They produce quality tennis players, and there isn't even a Tier V besides besides Bogota?
OTOH, if we lost one out of Indian Wells, or San Diego, or the Canadian Open, it doesn't do the tour all that much damage. I don't think losing Zurich or Berlin would do too much damage either. I'm NOT saying these events are unimportant. Just that the impact of them being cancelled outright would be relatively minimal to the tour as a whole.
These aren't comprehensive lists, nor am I committed to those choices. Just interested in launching the discussion.