...can we call her 2002 clay run a fluke? She only has 2 clay titles in her career...they just happen to be the biggies Rome and Paris.
Serena´s clay court eventstennisIlove09 said:...can we call her 2002 clay run a fluke? She only has 2 clay titles in her career...they just happen to be the biggies Rome and Paris.
Unfortunately, the thread was created by a non Serena fan also. LOLfaboozadoo15 said:this coming from a non serena williams fan...
As i said i other threads, Serena should not win every match she plays. No one does. Even less with the great talent that womens tennis has nowadays.DiVaMoNiCaSeLeS said:Oooooh she lost to Amelie... big deal!
And if she doesn't win the French Open then it means that somebody played better than her on the day. It has no baring on last year. She won last year because she was the best during those 2 weeks.
I was just waiting for someone to question her great run last year and at the beginning of this year.
have to disagree on that on. the way see played against chanda and monica was brilliant, and it is not her fault she drew fernandez in the semis (who see summarily dismissed anyway), whereas serena in reality could have easily lost to capriati in the semis.Experimentee said:Shes had lots of great performances on clay. Of course its not a fluke. Shes had a better clay career than Venus anyway, I'd actually say Venus' final last year was a fluke because she didnt have a tough draw and didnt win any other big clay title while Serena did