FrogBurger said:
Me too beauty, but imagine going to a grand slam and having to see your faves practice using binoculars.
Ah, I see you've been to Arthur Ashe Stadium then?:lol: Seriously, I'm not sure how to answer your poll, as several of the choices contained portions of things I'd like to see. First and foremost, I'd like to see the game progress to a more fan-friendly atmosphere. In another thread last Fall, I actually suggested they move the U.S. Open to Indian Wells, as the Tennis Garden at Indian Wells is far and away more fan-friendly and while it's a huge stadium, there's really not a bad seat in the house, and they got pretty much everything right- from the concession tents to the outside courts to the practice courts (I watched Martina Hings practice there a few years ago before she lost to Hantuchova, and it was an amazing experience).
The problem seems to be the widening gap between professional tennis and the tennis fan. I'm old enough to remember the tennis boom here in America back in the mid-70s, and remember our local indoor club where I first took tennis lessons being crammed with kids all wanting to be either Jimmy Connors, Billie Jean King, Bjorn Borg, or Chris Evert. The role models seemed like they were more clearly defined, and less self-aggrandizing back them (okay, maybe I'm waxing a little here), and there WERE more public courts to play on. I don't think that generation had any clue that when the transition was made from private clubs to open tennis, somewhere along the line an organized effort would have to be made to apply the brakes and keep the game appealing and accessible to the tennis fan (hence the USO concrete monstrosity mall that is Flushing Meadows). I'd love to see tennis return to the days when crowds of people used to lay on their stomachs at Forest Hills, just to be able to peek under the fences to watch their favorites play. At the U.S. Open, the players are so remote from the average tennis fan that you may as well be looking at a magazine.