Tennis Forum banner
1 - 17 of 17 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
40,318 Posts
height by itself, does not matter, unless the elements associated with the height come in play
The two that come to mind are net play/coverage, kick serve

How does the short player deal with a good kick server?
I don't know how often Maria, if at all uses kick good serve as part of her arsenal
But watching today's match, it seem like Errani was weather the storm when she decided to wait for the server inside the baseline and take the ball on the rise.

How will Errani fare passing Maria at the net?
I don't know, but Maria does not come to the net that match. So it is hard to say.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,388 Posts
Well, but is it needed? How does Errani compare to Klara Zakopalova?
While Errani can push, she's more a %-player. Zakopalova has more blast shots and managed to outplay Maria. But due to serve and return, Maria still won fairly easily. But OK, Errani is certainly stronger in the mental department, Zakopalova never believed she could do it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,574 Posts
Are there any really good kick serves in WTA this side of Serena? I can't think of any.
you must be joking, right?:lol:
Have you watched any of Maria's clay matches for the past two years?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,574 Posts
Is that that second serve with about 30% miss ratio that we are talking about? :lol:
who cares if she double faults? You asked a question and I provided an answer
 

· Registered
Joined
·
26,637 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
who cares if she (Masha) double faults? You asked a question and I provided an answer
This is an interesting topic, but worthy of its own thread (in general, not specific to this match) on who should perhaps use basically the same service for their first and second serve; as just "putting the ball in play" may be a worse bet than taking X% greater risk of a DF with an all-out service.

If Player A serves 60% on first and 90% on second, but Player B wins a much higher % of 2nd receiving points (on that surface, vs. that opponent) Player A might well be better off going all out on her 2nd serve all the time in the match; not just as the occasional "try to catch her by surprise".
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
14,576 Posts
height by itself, does not matter, unless the elements associated with the height come in play
The two that come to mind are net play/coverage, kick serve

How does the short player deal with a good kick server?
I don't know how often Maria, if at all uses kick good serve as part of her arsenal
But watching today's match, it seem like Errani was weather the storm when she decided to wait for the server inside the baseline and take the ball on the rise.

How will Errani fare passing Maria at the net?
I don't know, but Maria does not come to the net that match. So it is hard to say.
I would have thought by far the most significant advantage of a taller player would be taller = longer arms = more leverage = more power. They also have more clearance over the net when they serve which enables them to serve flatter and still achieve good angles.
 

· Adrenaline junkie
Joined
·
25,279 Posts
This is an interesting topic, but worthy of its own thread (in general, not specific to this match) on who should perhaps use basically the same service for their first and second serve; as just "putting the ball in play" may be a worse bet than taking X% greater risk of a DF with an all-out service.

If Player A serves 60% on first and 90% on second, but Player B wins a much higher % of 2nd receiving points (on that surface, vs. that opponent) Player A might well be better off going all out on her 2nd serve all the time in the match; not just as the occasional "try to catch her by surprise".
This math does not apply that simple. First serve is much more relaxed, less-pressure serve. If you use the same serve for the second serve, it is likely that you'll get a significantly worse percentage of serves in due to entirely psychological reasons.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
18,564 Posts
I would have thought by far the most significant advantage of a taller player would be taller = longer arms = more leverage = more power. They also have more clearance over the net when they serve which enables them to serve flatter and still achieve good angles.
You know, I've tried to do a bit of math on this ('cause I'm the geeky type), and what I come up with is that a 6 inch height difference doesn't really translate to very much, angle-wise, over a distance of 60+ feet. A serve down the T, landing on the service line, (neglecting spin, gravity, curving and other non-Pythagorean elements, but considering average arm vs height length, racquet size and jump height), is gonna have an angle of 9.9° for a 5'4" player and 10.9° for a 6'2" player... really, that's not a lot. The same goes for a serve that just makes the net; there really isn't a huge (mathematical) difference.

That said, I don't doubt that height makes a difference, but it's not just simply about angles.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,887 Posts
You know, I've tried to do a bit of math on this ('cause I'm the geeky type), and what I come up with is that a 6 inch height difference doesn't really translate to very much, angle-wise, over a distance of 60+ feet. A serve down the T, landing on the service line, (neglecting spin, gravity, curving and other non-Pythagorean elements, but considering average arm vs height length, racquet size and jump height), is gonna have an angle of 9.9° for a 5'4" player and 10.9° for a 6'2" player... really, that's not a lot. The same goes for a serve that just makes the net; there really isn't a huge (mathematical) difference.

That said, I don't doubt that height makes a difference, but it's not just simply about angles.
It would be true if Karlovic and Isner didn't exist. But they exist and can make such serves, which are impossible for all the rest, i mean about angles ..
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
14,576 Posts
You know, I've tried to do a bit of math on this ('cause I'm the geeky type), and what I come up with is that a 6 inch height difference doesn't really translate to very much, angle-wise, over a distance of 60+ feet. A serve down the T, landing on the service line, (neglecting spin, gravity, curving and other non-Pythagorean elements, but considering average arm vs height length, racquet size and jump height), is gonna have an angle of 9.9° for a 5'4" player and 10.9° for a 6'2" player... really, that's not a lot. The same goes for a serve that just makes the net; there really isn't a huge (mathematical) difference.

That said, I don't doubt that height makes a difference, but it's not just simply about angles.
I just saw this video that explains it rather better than I did.

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/video/08062012/58/hawk-eye-errani-must-find-length.html
 

· Registered
Joined
·
11,887 Posts
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top