I agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!Old format...by a mile...
I agree and I am so glad that I am not the only one who regrets the new format. Yes I feel that a reversal to the 16 nation format would be the ideal. And to be honest the top players definintely commited more back then to the old format. Now it can involve a lot more time and it is not surprising that so many players do not compete. And I also feel that there were so many great weeks when the old format was on the go.I feel it is less important now.Old format absolutely...I even think that would be the perfect format nowadays. Yeah, probably 32 teams it would be a bit too much today but a 16 team format in just one week would be perfect and the only way to get all the top players involved. To win the whole Cup a player only would have to play 4 single matches over a week. That's a commitment every player could fulfill (even the Williamses :help![]()
I am glad I have got into this forum- people have the same ideas as me!!!!!!!!Liked the old format better!
That was 1991, Spain's first victory everOld format best by a long way - went to Nottingham in '92, have never seen a Fed Cup match live since
Yes, that was a good week. Although I am still so dissapointed that Monique Javer couldnt see of Rafaella Reggi.Old format best by a long way - went to Nottingham in '92, have never seen a Fed Cup match live since
And it was a fabulous final against the United States!!!That was 1991, Spain's first victory ever![]()
I know...back then Arantxa & Conchita were still under 20, their doubles skills were still not very good and had to play the deciding doubles in the final for Spain's first Cup in history. They lost easily the first set against the powerful Americans but then they started playing out of their mind and won so easily...on hard! :hearts: :worship:And it was a fabulous final against the United States!!!
And with Durie losing in straight sets to Cecchini, that was the end of GB. I remember Clare Wood played in the first round and wondering at the time why Sara Gomer wasn't picked as she was around the venue - got her autograph, etc.Yes, that was a good week. Although I am still so dissapointed that Monique Javer couldnt see of Rafaella Reggi.
Yes there was a growing sense of disbelief as the match wound on. The first set Aranxta and Conchita were all over the place and mainly seemed to stay at the back allowing the United States to attack. However they were great as the match wore on and I remember Gigi Fernandez really lost it towards the end.I know...back then Arantxa & Conchita were still under 20, their doubles skills were still not very good and had to play the deciding doubles in the final for Spain's first Cup in history. They lost easily the first set against the powerful Americans but then they started playing out of their mind and won so easily...on hard! :hearts: :worship:
I think that the LTA were overly loyal to Monique Javer for switching to the UK. I agree, on that surface I think that Sara Gomer would have been the better choice, and it is a shame that Jo Durie lost a good many game points v Cecchini. Javer played well though and should have won.And with Durie losing in straight sets to Cecchini, that was the end of GB. I remember Clare Wood played in the first round and wondering at the time why Sara Gomer wasn't picked as she was around the venue - got her autograph, etc.
Yes I concur. You know apart from 1984,85 and 88 there was always a top American woman playing the Federation Cup under its old format. Now it does seem a real struggle to get them to play. I think the cup is a bit of a non event compared to the Davis Cup. It had much more prestige with the old format.Old format completely. We can't seem to get our best American women to play on a regular basis the way the new format is set up.