Joined
·
175 Posts
i agree. it's clear her strategy is to serve safe but effective. attacking second serves is a staple of the wta, so don't let your opponent do to you, what you want to do to them... she also serves with slice and no kick... she prioritizes placement and movement with high % and not ultimate pace with low %I have a theory that might explain why Emma has a surprisingly low first serve speed relative to her second serve. Namely, her own playstyle/game plan. If you start from a basis of 'this is what I would do if I were the opponent' it makes some sense.
Emma aggressively attacks second serves so she serves her second serve way faster than the average (so it's harder to attack) and dials back on her first serve so it's more consistently in (meaning less chances to attack the second serve). While that means her first serve is more vulnerable than it would otherwise be she's got confidence in her ability to control a rally to compensate.
Granted I'm a dude that doesn't play tennis to any sort of level so what makes sense in my head might make absolutely none in the real world but that was my thought when I saw those stats.