Koukalova always had the facial expression of someone suffering from an existential crisis, but Katka sometimes actually plays like she's having one :bigcry:Siniakova what a hopeless case, it was extremly even until 5-4 and then Siniakova started randomly playing some weird shots... Weird girl.
Serve and net game are pretty good too, but yeah, don't see the unbelievable potential some others believe she has - maybe top-10 if everything goes right, but not much more than that. Osaka has much higher ceiling imo, very raw still, but she can be a diamond. Siniakova is a zircon at best.Naomi was so good at times. It's great to watch her (the few) times she plays like this, when she's trying to play with more marging instead of robotically hitting herself out of court. The second set was a downright demolition.Some great serves on the deuce side despite the injury.
I know some people think KS is the best thing since sliced bread, but I am still not sold on her wonky technique and meltdowns. Only her BH really stands out atm, but hey, she's young and for sure she will keep on improving.
It's the BH, for sure. At her best, that backhand is one of the best on tour. She completely controls rallies, can change direction, and the angles she gets on it are sometimes jaw-dropping. There's also the fact that she's a very fiery on court presence, and she has a lot more tools in her repertoire than others her age, as you mentioned.Serve and net game are pretty good too, but yeah, don't see the unbelievable potential some others believe she has - maybe top-10 if everything goes right, but not much more than that. Osaka has much higher ceiling imo, very raw still, but she can be a diamond. Siniakova is a zircon at best.
That's true, especially these days, when I swear coaches don't even bother to pratice volleys with young players anymore, so one who does it reasonably well stands out much more.Serve and net game are pretty good too, but yeah, don't see the unbelievable potential some others believe she has - maybe top-10 if everything goes right, but not much more than that. Osaka has much higher ceiling imo, very raw still, but she can be a diamond. Siniakova is a zircon at best.
Yeah, Siniakova reminds me of Koukalova so much. She has maybe more potential, but I fear their careers will be similar.Koukalova always had the facial expression of someone suffering from an existential crisis, but Katka sometimes actually plays like she's having one :bigcry:
It's the BH, for sure. At her best, that backhand is one of the best on tour. She completely controls rallies, can change direction, and the angles she gets on it are sometimes jaw-dropping. There's also the fact that she's a very fiery on court presence, and she has a lot more tools in her repertoire than others her age, as you mentioned.
But, I agree. Her ceiling is Top 10 atm, and I don't know if she'll get there, with all the tears that she cries on court.
Her crazy meltdowns remind me of peak Zvonareva - esp. the crying/screaming/facepalming combo - but without the same clean technique. I think she'd be very very lucky if she could achieve as much as Vera tbh.That's true, especially these days, when I swear coaches don't even bother to pratice volleys with young players anymore, so one who does it reasonably well stands out much more.
I haven't watched Siniakova so much anyway. Maybe it's the combination of bad/weird technique and immaturity, but so far my impression is that it all kind of unravels alarmingly easy and fast, even when she seems to be playing well.