Fun fact: I dont care, you know/knew what I meant, when I said it. Moving on.Fun fact: it is impossible to "literally" imply something.
Your entire emotional and overly aggressive response is based on your insinuations that I "implied" Kerber was a lock in slam finals, which I a) never said, and b) said nothing that remotely resembles that. "No joke" is not the same as a lock.
You are getting far too aggressive and off-topic. The fact that I'm not "debating" what you imagine me saying doesn't mean that I don't know how to debate. It means that I don't want to debate an imaginary topic on a view that I don't hold. What am I supposed to do here to satisfy your demands - provide evidence to support a point that I have already said that I don't believe in just because you imagine me believing in it? No thanks.
All youre doing, by calling my response "Too Aggressive" is still trying, key word TRYING to undermine my response. Instead of discussing the topic at hand. I havent attacked you at all, yet youre considering my responses to be "emotional" and "aggressive" yet youre the one steadily PERSONALLY coming for me. Make that, make sense.
So are you going to talk tennis/topic at hand, or just continue to give low budget psycho-analysis ?
Youre literally on a forum, within a discussion, about an imaginary topic. Lmao