Tennis Forum banner

81 - 100 of 125 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,196 Posts
Unrrelated...but remember when his diqpics supposedly leaked?

I do remember. He is hung like a donkey (I think they were real).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,196 Posts
What from who and when 😮 I have never heard that so its obviously fake news 😆😄


You can still find them on the internet. Just google a little bit. The story is a couple years old already ...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,196 Posts
haha no I can't google that and I believe its fake anyway :ROFLMAO:

Just because you have never heard it ... does not mean it is fake. :) Obviously it is not 100% certain or even 80% certain but I think the story is true.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
38,070 Posts
Discussion Starter #86 (Edited)
Again, what's your business if he's an anti-vaxxer? His personal delusions, like those of religious people, are his to hold. How is that relevant to the rest of your deranged ravings about the guy?
Sorry, the sheer idiocy of this statement made me too depressed to even reply.

This is obviously untrue, but if it makes you feel better, have at it.
Correction: Djokovic at the peak of his fame is a nobody compared to Serena, Sharapova or even Anna Kournikova at theirs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sinjo and Perun

·
Registered
Joined
·
589 Posts
I don't see this at all. She's often self-deprecating and dismissive of her own accomplishments until one of her fellow commentators brings up her record(s), and she usually chimes in with something about how much times have changed.

I think she's being cheeky here, and it's well done. She and Martina deserve a hell of a lot of respect for what they did for tennis and women's sport in general.
Evert is one of the most gracious champions you will ever meet. She's not self-absorbed, she doesn't constantly refer to her incredible record. And no, to all the haters, she was not just a clay court specialist. She retired with a winning percentage of 90 percent of all her matches, on all surfaces. How many other players can say that?
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
487 Posts
Funny thing is that venus vs serena rivalry always got much better ratings than the three stooges. Federer, nadal, and that narcissistic joker.
Are you dumb? Maybe in one country of the world but Venus-Serena doesn’t get half the views of the big 3.Venus is washed out and is basically a nobody these days.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,737 Posts
Sorry, the sheer idiocy of this statement made me too depressed to even reply.
You mean like the sheer idiocy of refuting Djokovic being the best player of his generation because he "ate a bagel in a Grand Slam final" - that kind of sheer idiocy?
Or you mean the sheer idiocy of claiming a potential GOAT is "cashing in on male privilege" as if winning nearly $150m in prize money alone for your actual performances has nothing to do with what you're cashing, and comparing him to Siegemund - that kind of sheer idiocy?
Or you mean the sheer idiocy of mocking an athlete's "butterface looks" - that kind of sheer idiocy?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,672 Posts
Correction: Djokovic at the peak of his fame is a nobody compared to Serena, Sharapova or even Anna Kournikova at theirs.

go ahead and claim whatever makes you feel better, but Djokovic is not a nobody compared to anyone in the tennis world. I have never liked the guy or his playing style, and i usually root against him, but he's obviously a winner and an ATG.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
487 Posts
go ahead and claim whatever makes you feel better, but Djokovic is not a nobody compared to anyone in the tennis world. I have never liked the guy or his playing style, and i usually root against him, but he's obviously a winner and an ATG.
You idiot he is not talking about tennis acheivements. Sharapova at her peak fame was massive and so is Serena right now. Non-Tennis fans know Roger and Rafa. Only a few know Djokovic.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,672 Posts
You idiot he is not talking about tennis acheivements. Sharapova at her peak fame was massive and so is Serena right now. Non-Tennis fans know Roger and Rafa. Only a few know Djokovic.

Why don't you go over to Twitter and start an account where you judge celebrity value... come back here when you've got 50,000 followers and then you can lecture me about who's famous and who's not famous.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,737 Posts
You idiot he is not talking about tennis acheivements. Sharapova at her peak fame was massive and so is Serena right now. Non-Tennis fans know Roger and Rafa. Only a few know Djokovic.
I've never seen my mom watch a tennis match, but I saw her positively surprised when she heard Nadal beat Djokovic in the recent French Open final. She knew enough about Djokovic to know that any opponent of his is an underdog. I've never met anyone most casually acquainted with tennis who doesn't know who Novak Djokovic is. So there is no basis for the idiotic claim that he's a "nobody" compared to anyone in tennis. What makes the claim doubly idiotic is its contradiction of the the earlier claim of his trading on his male privilege. Sharapova is apparently a bigger star than an infinitely more accomplished athlete because she has great legs and looks good in a bikini or miniskirt. Yet, he's the one with the "privilege". Hilariously dumb.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
487 Posts
I've never seen my mom watch a tennis match, but I saw her positively surprised when she heard Nadal beat Djokovic in the recent French Open final. She knew enough about Djokovic to know that any opponent of his is an underdog. I've never met anyone most casually acquainted with tennis who doesn't know who Novak Djokovic is. So there is no basis for the idiotic claim that he's a "nobody" compared to anyone in tennis. What makes the claim doubly idiotic is its contradiction of the the earlier claim of his trading on his male privilege. Sharapova is apparently a bigger star than an infinitely more accomplished athlete because she has great legs and looks good in a bikini or miniskirt. Yet, he's the one with the "privilege". Hilariously dumb.
LoL, so your mom's opinion is the bible huh? Your personal anecdotes are literally useless.
Also, when did I say he has privilege? Maria was appealing to the media with her looks/backstory while Djokovic was plain despicable and deservedly disliked. That's why even though Djokovic is number 1 Federer makes 5 times more endorsements than him.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,737 Posts
LoL, so your mom's opinion is the bible huh? Your personal anecdotes are literally useless.
Also, when did I say he has privilege? Maria was appealing to the media with her looks/backstory while Djokovic was plain despicable and deservedly disliked. That's why even though Djokovic is number 1 Federer makes 5 times more endorsements than him.
You claimed "only a few" non-tennis fans know Djokovic. What's that based on? Your worthless personal opinion? Who said anything about you saying Djokovic had privilege. You were defending someone else's post and it's pretty clear that's the post I'm referring to so what are you on about?

Nobody gives a flying fuck about Sharapova's backstory. There's nothing remarkable about it or her life. Her early image as the new Kournikova who actually had some success and the great white, blonde hope who could overthrow Serena was the entire basis of her fame, and it's a battered image with being busted as a willful doper.

Why only Federer? Why not note that Nadal and Serena make less in endorsements than him? If he was German or Japanese or American, he'd earn far more, so it's a pretty useless criteria.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,451 Posts
Who says that while being a fan of women's tennis? Go back to troll land..I mean menstennisforum... :rolleyes:
I am a big fan of women tennis and watch it even more that the ATP. But facts are facts. How could you even argue against that? Calling me a troll is not an argument.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
12,106 Posts
I am a big fan of women tennis and watch it even more that the ATP. But facts are facts. How could you even argue against that? Calling me a troll is not an argument.
How is WTA prize money being inflated a "fact"? That is your opinion that it is inflated, not a fact... That's the problem with male chauvisnism, they use biological differences between genders to justify their opinion that men are superior to women, and call it "facts" or "part of nature" or "Biology" or whatever....
 
81 - 100 of 125 Posts
Top