Notice how they've showed 5 men's matches is a row... 
Yup, that's the one.Snuffkin said:Is this not the infamous 'abortion' match? If it is, then I can only guess that is the reason they are showing it. In which case, I suppose the next rain delay at Wimbledon means the BBC will subject us all to a repeat of Rusedski-Roddick from this year.
There is no hard and fast rule saying that you can only show 1991 coverage during rain delays (although you'd never know it). Since we see those matches every year, how about something I haven't seen, like 96.Julian said:They shoulda shown the Monica-Jennifer match or even the Martina N.-Graf SF from 91!!![]()
I would love to see Graf Navratilova or Seles Graf (didn't they have great matches) or Gabriela Sabatini (the first Kournikova!)disposablehero said:There is no hard and fast rule saying that you can only show 1991 coverage during rain delays (although you'd never know it). Since we see those matches every year, how about something I haven't seen, like 96.
Yeah, before the age of the emotionless Edberg and that robot who just retired, Pete.treufreund said:well you know that was back in the days when it was still UNDERSTOOD that people have emotions and showed them.![]()
Jimmy was tennis's raining bad boy before the age of McBrat. Anyway, stars of the 1970 & 1980s were playboys: acting up on court, judging wet t-shirt contests, snorting coke.Monique said:"abortion" match? what about it? I'm too young to remember Connors or Krickstein playing, but wasn't Connors supposed to be the hunk of his days
? I certainly looks like he's had the crowd support over there...
I know...that's the scary partTennis Fool said:Yeah, before the age of the emotionless Edberg and that robot who just retired, Pete.
Can you imagine Pete telling the ref, "You're an abortion"?
Richie: Connors had really calmed down by that time![]()