Joined
·
12,803 Posts
This is being discussed in another thread but i want to see a poll
patrick :wavey:Sonic The Hedgehog said:yes....
they serve the top players completely.... but is that such a bad thing in the long run?
Everybody is always moaning that the season is to long and players get injured and blah blah blah. But here are byes- something that reduces the number of games played for the players who play the most, I think it's a really positive thing. I mean somebody who goes out in the first round all the time may only play around 18 games a year where as a top player may play about 100, it's an easy way of reducing the number of games without shortening the season. :shrug: I know someone said in the other thread that the ATP don't have it so why should WTA, but i think it's a really positive thing and people should be saying the WTA has it, so why doesn't the ATP? :wavey:the bambi said:nope. never have been. players are dying to play but tourney directors insist on byes. yawn.
I agree.james mack said:i am
however, i am not in favour of lucky losers getting them![]()
Only 4 players get a bye, what about the others...Or do only the ones who get a bye risk burn out.james mack said:why are people voting 'no'?
do you want more injuries and burn out? :shrug:
very funny miss. lawsonHelen Lawson said:I don't have any strong feelings either way. Live and let live is Helen's view. My person thought is that they're just gay people in denial. I think there's also a difference between physical bisexuality and emotional bisexuality. A load of gay people have had a hetero experience early on, I personally don't think this makes them bisexual, though technically, that is what it is.
Because byes are mostly in the bigger tier 1 and 2 tourneys... and only top 4 seeds usually get them (I believe IW amd Miami are the exceptions). I do not feel this is fair to all players - especially now there are no bonus points, AND it's also meaning that some players who could have been in the draw now can't be, coz there are 4 byes.james mack said:why are people voting 'no'?
do you want more injuries and burn out? :shrug: