Joined
·
12,908 Posts
I def dont like third set tiebreaks. The whole long match just comes down to that one game, like you said, and it only takes one mistake, or bad call or let cord and the match could be over. They should play it out like other grand slams do.
The game score is very unlikely to get past 15 games all at the maximum, so the 102-104 scenario will never happen. It has never happened at any other grand slam. To use something so unlikely as an argument for a tiebreak is just ridiculous.
To me the player who deserves to win a match is one who can break their opponents serve and hold their own, not one who can win ONE point on their opponents serve, then win ONE point on their own.
The game score is very unlikely to get past 15 games all at the maximum, so the 102-104 scenario will never happen. It has never happened at any other grand slam. To use something so unlikely as an argument for a tiebreak is just ridiculous.
To me the player who deserves to win a match is one who can break their opponents serve and hold their own, not one who can win ONE point on their opponents serve, then win ONE point on their own.
