Tennis Forum banner

1 - 20 of 22 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,577 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Seeing Peer's result today made me wonder about another person who was red hot during the clay season in Safina. She had one impressive win after another after another before she fell apart in the 1st set against Kuznetsova.

She's an obvious talent, but was curious how people think her game will do on the grass. Personally I think like Peer she won't do as well? Thoughts?
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
8,732 Posts
I for some reason agree with you, that maybe she won't do as well on grass. I have no evidence to back it up, it's just a feeling that she won't be as effective.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,918 Posts
grass is made for one-dimensional ball bashers, i imagine safina would feel right at home
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,073 Posts
Not that it means a whole lot, but Dinara got to the finals of junior Wimby I'm pretty sure. She won a couple matches @ Wimbledon last year, before going down to Linds tamely. I don't think she'll be as good on grass as she is on clay or hard, but she won't be ineffective.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,950 Posts
can't remember any of dinara's grass results, didn't she have a crack in her backbone during one wimbledon but still decided to play and lost love and love in the first match? would of been a couple of years ago. i think clay is dinara's best surface so she might not do quite as well on grass but it does suit her game with the big serve and big groundies, the points are shorter as well which i would think suits dinara.
 

·
Banned
Joined
·
25,017 Posts
She won't do well this grass season. She's not as athletic as some of the other girls that hit much harder ie Venus, and even Sharapova.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
47,688 Posts
heylookimgay said:
grass is made for one-dimensional ball bashers, i imagine safina would feel right at home
Right. Because clay is obviously meant for mindless ball bashers as well, right? That's why Dinara did so well on clay.

:rolleyes:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
14,340 Posts
She's an incredibly streaky player, so who knows.. I'd think her results will taper off a bit during the grass and get back on track during the hard court season.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,058 Posts
Like Marat Dinara could have a good day on grass and push the best but she has pretty extreme grips on both sides, ordinary volleys, doesn't tend to have a middle level in her game.

She'll still probably beat most players ranked below her but i don't she her getting very far.

I think Peer isn't that bad on grass though - just a bad result against Dechy (who's game is suited to grass).
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,914 Posts
Dinara has a Davenport-like game: (1) hits hard and flat, (2) tall and thick build, (3) not the fastest mover, (4) loves balls that sit up, (5) consistent/hard serve.

Dinara needs to mature as a player in order to really play well on grass...like Lindsay did. She needs to get used to the bounce, learn how to move on the surface, and improve her net play.

Basically, I don't think she's got a natural grass-court game...but she'll get more and more dangerous on the surface as time passes. She could go the Davenport way...or end up with mediocre results similar to Pierce (another player she reminds me of).

SF
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,918 Posts
~PPP~ said:
Right. Because clay is obviously meant for mindless ball bashers as well, right? That's why Dinara did so well on clay.

:rolleyes:
well in a sharapova/safina 4th round encounter, one of them has to win i guess. notice, however, when she played kuznetsova, a player with some real clay skills, she only won 3 points in a set. in a slam quarterfinal!!

is that some type of record? the least competitive set ever played in a slam quarterfinal?
 

·
Team WTAworld, Senior Member
Joined
·
7,224 Posts
I think she will be a contender...........into the quarters at least!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,914 Posts
heylookimgay said:
grass is made for one-dimensional ball bashers, i imagine safina would feel right at home
I think that's a very one-dimensional way to look at grass-court tennis. If this was the case, Seles would have certainly ruled Wimbledon over players like Graf, Navratilova, Hingis and Novotna?

SF
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
20,008 Posts
heylookimgay said:
well in a sharapova/safina 4th round encounter, one of them has to win i guess. notice, however, when she played kuznetsova, a player with some real clay skills, she only won 3 points in a set. in a slam quarterfinal!!

is that some type of record? the least competitive set ever played in a slam quarterfinal?
She also has wins over Clijsters, Dementieva, Kuznetsova on clay and assorted wins against big names on other surfaces.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,918 Posts
sfselesfan said:
I think that's a very one-dimensional way to look at grass-court tennis. If this was the case, Seles would have certainly ruled Wimbledon over players like Graf, Navratilova, Hingis and Novotna?

SF
silly analogy.

1) seles' serve was no good
2) grass-court tennis wasn't always big babe ball bashing. being a competent net rusher or having a biting slice (graf, nav, hingis, novotna) are virtually useless traits on hard courts with oversized racquets, which, if you missed the memo, is how today's game is played. more girls were trained to play better grass-court tennis in seles' era than in today's era. grass in a novelty
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
11,058 Posts
sfselesfan said:
Dinara has a Davenport-like game: (1) hits hard and flat, (2) tall and thick build, (3) not the fastest mover, (4) loves balls that sit up, (5) consistent/hard serve.
don't agree with really. Similar body types but Safina hits her forehand with far more topspin than Davenport and has much more extreme grips. Her first and second serve are not anywhere near Davenport's and her service motions won't really allow for much improvement in that because she's doesn't use her body at all, whereas Lindsay's is close to perfect. She also lacks the natural touch that Davenport has around the net.

The Pierce comparison is more accurate but even then i'd suggest Mary flatter game is more suited to grass.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,914 Posts
heylookimgay said:
silly analogy.

1) seles' serve was no good
2) grass-court tennis wasn't always big babe ball bashing. being a competent net rusher or having a biting slice (graf, nav, hingis, novotna) are virtually useless traits on hard courts with oversized racquets, which, if you missed the memo, is how today's game is played. more girls were trained to play better grass-court tennis in seles' era than in today's era. grass in a novelty
Seles had a great serve. At her peak she was one of the fastest servers in the top ten...not to mention she was a lefty!

Graf, Navratilova (1990), Hingis and Novotna all won Wimbledon well after the advent of oversized rackets.

SF
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,914 Posts
switz said:
don't agree with really. Similar body types but Safina hits her forehand with far more topspin than Davenport and has much more extreme grips. Her first and second serve are not anywhere near Davenport's and her service motions won't really allow for much improvement in that because she's doesn't use her body at all, whereas Lindsay's is close to perfect. She also lacks the natural touch that Davenport has around the net.

The Pierce comparison is more accurate but even then i'd suggest Mary flatter game is more suited to grass.
Splitting hairs. Sure your points are valid...but the similarities exist. Safina is still young. If you read what I wrote you'd see that I said Safina needed to mature her net play still. Davenport didn't always have competent net play...she developed it over many years of playing doubles.

SF
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
8,916 Posts
we'll see won't we:)
 
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Top