It may not be exaggerated but it must be including all the performances bonuses you can think of. She would probably need to win the Calendar Slam twice within the duration of the contract to get the $100 millions. There was a lot of rumours about Nike's imminent withdrawal from the tennis market just last year.
It says it's one of the biggest ever *for a teenager*. She could get 500K/year and that would probably be massive for a Slamless teenager.
It reminded me of the time Raonic's agent said his New Balance was similar to a Big Four deal. As if. :spit:
The 100 million is Australian $$$ , 70 millions US $$$. One week later , none of the big US tennis writers has written about it .
The article did not talk about term(s). For example, 70 over 8 years is different than 60 over 10
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk