I can say without a shadow of a doubt that Volcana will be wrong. ROFL.Volcana said:Code:HENIN-HARDENNE_ PETROVA | |__PETROVA ___ | DAVENPORT | RUBIN ______| | DAVENPORT | |__DAVENPORT CH | CLIJSTERS KUZNETSOVA ____ | LIKHOVTSEVA | | |__KUZNETSOVA__| | CLIJSTERS RAYMOND ______| CLIJSTERS
I was thinking along this line, without the scores. However, I believe this is in reminiscence of former Davenport.sonfo said:Svetlana bt Elena 6-3 7-5
Justine bt Petrova 7-6 7-6
Lindsay bt Chanda 6-4 5-7 6-3
Kim bt Raymond 6-2 6-2
------
Justine bt Svetlana 6-3 6-4
Davenport bt Kim 7-6 4-6 6-3
------
Davenport bt Justine 7-5 7-6
It's not just that, but on hardcourts Nadya is better ( than Henin ) in every department - serve, forehand, backhand. Except for volley, perhaps, and footspeed.Hawk said:If I were Justine I would be concerned..she came pretty close to losing to a big groundstroker with not much of a serve...now she's playing a big groundstroker with a big serve.
It's a new Justine out there. A Slam and a couple of big wins do that to you. She's finding inner strengths she didn't even know she had.ys said:It's not just that, but on hardcourts Nadya is better ( than Henin ) in every department - serve, forehand, backhand. Except for volley, perhaps, and footspeed.
Ryan16 said:Volcana automatically assumed Clijsters HAD to have the cakewalk draw, and assumed Davenport/Rubin was in Henins side.
As long as Dementieva had legs to run yesterday, Justine had no say in the match and was completely outplayed. It's not my opinion. It's Justine's. Read her interview. Petrova is every bit as good as Dementieva, except that now she will have an advantage of fresher legs, because she had a cakewlk match yesterday, and she has no problem ( unlike Dementieva ) with jetlag consequences, because she is already more than two on West Coast.TennisPower said:It's a new Justine out there. A Slam and a couple of big wins do that to you. She's finding inner strengths she did even know she had.
LOL! That was great!Ryan16 said:Volcana automatically assumed Clijsters HAD to have the cakewalk draw, and assumed Davenport/Rubin was in Henins side.
:haha:Ryan16 said:Volcana automatically assumed Clijsters HAD to have the cakewalk draw, and assumed Davenport/Rubin was in Henins side.
Then why is Justine leading the head-to-head 2-0, and why doesn't Nadia win slams or beat Clijsters, Davenport, the Williams sisters etc.?ys said:As long as Dementieva had legs to run yesterday, Justine had no say in the match and was completely outplayed. It's not my opinion. It's Justine's. Read her interview. Petrova is every bit as good as Dementieva, except that now she will have an advantage of fresher legs, because she had a cakewlk match yesterday, and she has no problem ( unlike Dementieva ) with jetlag consequences, because she is already more than two on West Coast.
Amen to that!!!!ys said:Because she had an year-long injury, after which she was ranked in the second hundred, and every player in that situation would have to fight for every bit of confidence, that lacks really badly. But it is coming together.
OK, she didn't beat Venus in Roland Garros.QUEENLINDSAY said:Amen to that!!!!
I believed she started to believed she could really go up there whe she bt Venus in RG. She really have all the strokes, she just have to do it.