Tennis Forum banner

1 - 4 of 4 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,551 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
I did a top 100 Computer Ranking List based on the updated 1970 results page. I was pleased to see that it didn't vary much from the "official lists" of the experts of the day. I'm always interested in those outside the top ten that don't get much credit for their achievements.

1 Court 405
2 King 217
3 Casals 181
4 Wade 172
5 Niessen 169
6 Durr 130
7 Jones 126
8 Melville 125
9 Krantzcke 117
10 Richey 115
11 Heldman 109
12 Dalton 94
13 Shaw 90
14 Goolagong 86
15 Walkden 67
16 Hunt 65
17 Hogan 65
18 Bartkowicz 62
19 Sandberg 61
20 Chanfreau 60
21 Vopickova 58
22 Gourlay 54
23 Walsh
24 Martinez 50
25 Curtis 48
26 Morozova 47
27 Ziegenfuss 45
28 Williams 45
29 Hoesl 44
30 Emanuel 42
31 Pigeon 35
32 Roussouw 33
33 Pericoli 30
34 Grubb Hansen 29.5
35 Carter 29
36 DeFina Johnson 29
37 Molesworth 29
38 Teeguarden 28
39 Harter 28
(tie) N. Truman 28
41 J. Cooper 26
42 De Roubin 26
43 VanZyl DuPlooy 26
44 Brummer 24.5
45 Kirk 24
(tie) Stove 24
(tie) Tuero 24
48 Schaar 22
49 Toyne Moore 21.5
50 Harris 21
51 Guzman 20
52 Bloomer Brasher 19.5
(tie) K. Sawamatsu 19.5
54 Bentley 19.25
55 Arias 19
56 Liem 17
57 Michel 16.5
58 Townsend 16
59 Bakker 15.5
60 Amos 15.5
61 O'Hara 15.25
62 Overton 15
63 Graebner 14.5
64 Pande 14.25
65 G. Hansen 14
66 Palmeova
67 Petersen 14
68 Gilchrist 14
69 Borka 13.75
70 Bonicelli 13.25
71 Beaven 12.25
72 Cody 12
73 Walsham 12
74 Evert 12
75 Alexander 11.75
76 Salome 11.5
77 Edwards 11.5
78 Lundquist 11
79 Burton 10.75
80 Spinoza 10
81 Tym 9.75
82 Szorenyi 9.5
83 Austin 9.5
84 Schediwy 9.5
(tie) Young 9.5
86 Greenwood 9.25
87 Holdsworth 9
88 Capozzi 8.5
89 Sue Stap 8.25
(tie) Terras 8.25
91 Murakami 8
92 Hard 8
93 Nasuelli 8
94 Lloyd 8
(tie) Lehane O'Neil 8
96 Footman 7.75
97 Newberry 7.75
98 Alvarez 7.5
99 Walhof 7.25
100 Cowie 7.25
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,551 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Just gave point values to events based on quality of field and reputation of the event. 100 for Wimbledon winner, 70 for French and USO winner, on down. Some events were so minor they might receive as little as .5 for the winner and some local events no points at all. r/u got 60-70% of winner and so on. Fields for some events vary from year to year, so I leaned heavily on how many top players were in the field. I took the top 12 results for each player. My experience with that era is that some players played 25+ events and others played less than 10. The experts seemed not to punish those who played little nor did they reward those who played a lot. 12 seemed to be a fair number because the experts often ranked players in their top tens who played only a handful of tournaments.

Also I ran the year from the conclusion of the Dewar circuit in 1969 through the Dewar circuit in 1970.

Ann Jones played exceptionally well, but simply didn't play the Slams. You wonder what she might have done at the French or Wimbledon. From what I've heard, though the Wimbledon final was a classic in terms of being close, it wasn't a classic in terms of quality of play. Both players were somewhat hobbled.

Goolagong won all over the world, but most of her wins were in 2nd level fields over players like Joyce Williams. Still, not bad for an 18/19 year old.

Richey had knee trouble and only made the top ten after a late summer/early fall run. Glamorous Helga Schultze Hoesl was interesting. She played almost solely near home and on clay, but had great results even winning a strong German Open. She played so little she only reached #29.

Vlasta Vopickova (Jan Kodes' sister) may have had her best year on the international level at #21. She was a French QFist and reached the R16 at Wimbledon.
 
1 - 4 of 4 Posts
Top