TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic
Thread: Acapulco MD + Q Lists Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Mar 3rd, 2016 02:44 PM
Nightcrawl3r
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigo View Post
See? As I said: WTA never disappoints...

Has Martic withdrawn from the SE spot?
Or WTA have "chosen" Rogers over Martic 'cause Rogers was a finalist and Martic a semi-finalist?
(I know it's not what it's said on the rules.... but who knows at this point)

Don't leave us wondering, Forum Gods!
Martic withdrew at some time from the Q Alt list but doesn't matter much.

Rogers should have never gotten that SE. At best, even if she was on the Q Alt list, she wasn't anymore on Thursday morning so there's that.


Too many irregularities lately . Not cool ... Another one this week involving Sorribes Tormo (2 tournaments in 1 week) ......
.
Feb 22nd, 2016 09:16 PM
Trigo
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightcrawl3r View Post
It doesn't make absolutely any sense (even if Martic let's say withdrew in the last days). The Special Exempt rules are clear.

Even if she (Rogers) was Q Alt and she was accepted sometime during the time of post #38 and post #46 from here... it doesn't make sense. I'll ask about this 2nd situation to know if she was indeed Q Alt but even so, looks like the WTA do what they want. There was even a rule for the Dubai MDWC screw-up but for the SE there are just a few standard direct common sense phrases and look what happened already this year in Hobart and Acapulco
.
See? As I said: WTA never disappoints...

Has Martic withdrawn from the SE spot?
Or WTA have "chosen" Rogers over Martic 'cause Rogers was a finalist and Martic a semi-finalist?
(I know it's not what it's said on the rules.... but who knows at this point)

Don't leave us wondering, Forum Gods!
Feb 21st, 2016 10:25 PM
Nightcrawl3r
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greco View Post
SE for Rogers
It doesn't make absolutely any sense (even if Martic let's say withdrew in the last days). The Special Exempt rules are clear.

Even if she (Rogers) was Q Alt and she was accepted sometime during the time of post #38 and post #46 from here... it doesn't make sense. I'll ask about this 2nd situation to know if she was indeed Q Alt but even so, looks like the WTA do what they want. There was even a rule for the Dubai MDWC screw-up but for the SE there are just a few standard direct common sense phrases and look what happened already this year in Hobart and Acapulco
.
Feb 21st, 2016 09:28 PM
Greco
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightcrawl3r View Post
Yes. Special Exempt goes to Martic , as Schiavone withdrew from the list yesterday
.
SE for Rogers
Feb 21st, 2016 04:49 PM
Meelis
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmo! View Post
So we can expect both singles and doubles today?
Yes. Doubles soon and singles later.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmo! View Post
When MD?
Isnt always earlier then Sunday?
It's up to the tournament. Unlike the qualifying and doubles draws, main draw ceremony does not have a set time. Only rule is that it can't be before the qualifying sign-in closes and no later than 3pm the day before the MD starts.
Feb 21st, 2016 04:46 PM
SERVivor
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

latest md draw release of any tournament in recent memory
Feb 21st, 2016 03:41 PM
ajmo!
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

So we can expect both singles and doubles today?
Feb 21st, 2016 12:59 PM
Nightcrawl3r
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Davidspell View Post
When the MD will be out?


Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmo! View Post
When MD?
Isnt always earlier then Sunday?
Acapulco is "special" . It's been on Sunday for it . For ATP it's @ 2.30 pm so probably around that time for WTA as well
.
Feb 21st, 2016 08:24 AM
ajmo!
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

When MD?
Isnt always earlier then Sunday?
Feb 21st, 2016 06:00 AM
Drake1980
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Nice to see Lourdes in MD.
Feb 20th, 2016 02:55 PM
Trigo
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightcrawl3r View Post
It isn't specified so most likely not. There are just a few phrases regarding SE in the rules , unlike in the ATP and they should really add more. See also what happened in Shenzhen -> Hobart. That would have never happened in ATP
.
Well... you know how the WTA never disappoints...
:P

Thanks anyway!
Feb 20th, 2016 02:52 PM
Nightcrawl3r
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigo View Post
Sure, that's exactly what I was thinking.

But what I really wanted to know is:
If she was still a Q-Alt, would she be eligible for a SE spot?
It isn't specified so most likely not. There are just a few phrases regarding SE in the rules , unlike in the ATP and they should really add more. See also what happened in Shenzhen -> Hobart. That would have never happened in ATP
.
Feb 20th, 2016 02:36 PM
Trigo
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightcrawl3r View Post
Obviously got in between Feb. 18th - 7.35 pm CET and Feb. 19th - 11.45 pm CET and whilst her match vs. Arruabarrena finished @ about Feb. 19th - 9.55 pm CET, I think you get the point
.
Sure, that's exactly what I was thinking.

But what I really wanted to know is:
If she was still a Q-Alt, would she be eligible for a SE spot?
Feb 20th, 2016 02:27 PM
Nightcrawl3r
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trigo View Post
Can someone clarify it to me?

A player can get in through SE even if she is just a Q-Alt?
(I mean: if her ranking was not high enough even for Q-List)

I don't know if this was the case with Martic.
With all these withdraws, she could have got into Q-list at the last minute.
Obviously got in between Feb. 18th - 7.35 pm CET and Feb. 19th - 11.45 pm CET and whilst her match vs. Arruabarrena finished @ about Feb. 19th - 9.55 pm CET, I think you get the point
.
Feb 20th, 2016 02:08 PM
Trigo
Re: Acapulco MD + Q Lists

Can someone clarify it to me?

A player can get in through SE even if she is just a Q-Alt?
(I mean: if her ranking was not high enough even for Q-List)

I don't know if this was the case with Martic.
With all these withdraws, she could have got into Q-list at the last minute.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome