Camera placement = excitement -
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 (permalink) Old Nov 13th, 2018, 07:29 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 3,115
Camera placement = excitement

Why canít we watch tennis with the camera this close to court anymore? Or the quick closeups during the point and all the dynamic camera movement.

Compare the match above with this from just a few years later, which seems to have become the modern go-to camera placement

wth? I honestly think this is one of the major reasons tennis is no longer a big deal in the US (compared to football, basketball, baseball and surprisingly, even GOLF).

Has this ever been brought up by anyone - WTA, ATP, any commentators, Johnny Smack?
Mark43 is online now  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 3 (permalink) Old Nov 20th, 2018, 04:07 AM
Moderator - BFTP
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 24,839
Re: Camera placement = excitement

Hi Mark.

It took me a few viewing to get your point-but so true!

I also like the camera work on the 1975 US final-the camera angle is spot on even the sound pops. Notice the close ups of Colette Evert in the audience blended in with the actual points at 1:49

Good commentary enhances too. Tony Trabert and Julie Heldman. Julie on Evert: "Chris is different from any other player. She is all concentration. She plays well because she plays within her own limits."

Visit us at the Blast From The Past: Where Tennis History Lives!
Rollo is offline  
post #3 of 3 (permalink) Old Nov 27th, 2018, 09:38 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Berkeley, CA
Posts: 3,115
Re: Camera placement = excitement

Thanks Rollo. The 1975 coverage is a perfect example. This is the exact moment I fell in love with tennis and had the camera been both static and placed high in the stands, as it is on basically every match telecast today, I do not think I would be a tennis fan. I donít understand how no one else seems to get this. The Australian open beginning in 1988 seems to have started this awful way of filming a match and now it is completely given protocol. I donít get it at all, and it seems like such a simple fix. Is it something to do with larger high definition televisions? I know Europe got better high def much earlier than the US, but it still doesnít make sense to me. The camera is now universally so high above the court that itís difficult to tell which player is which. And itís always static, never a jump cut during a point...thatís literally unheard of.
But I swear if just one network (the Tennis Channel!?) could experiment with the Ďradicalí coverage techniques of the 1970s to early 80s there is a chance people might become interested in tennis again. I mean regular sports fans that only know Roger and Serena.

The coverage of that time period was dynamic with close ups and a camera positioned to actually let you see the flight, speed and spins of the ball. Right now the camera is positioned so far away itís hard to discern any of that, let alone the players faces and emotions during a point.

Who can I contact to try to make this point. No one here seems to understand besides you, but to me itís immediately obvious and so much preferable.
Mark43 is online now  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome