When did we become obsessed with "pushers?" - TennisForum.com
 133Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 01:43 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
shap_half's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 17,269
                     
When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

I've been on this board for over 16 years, and it wasn't until the last six or seven years that I feel like TF has really leaned on this concept of a pusher. What brought this on? Who was the first pusher that you guys rallied against? And historically, who is the first top-flight pusher of women's tennis?

I'm really quite keen about getting a conversation going about how this came to be, and what the big deal is: Why are you some of you so angry at players who adopt a more defensive-minded approach to tennis. Not everyone can hit blistering groundstrokes, you know? Where do you draw the line when calling someone a pusher? Was Martina H a pusher? Was Kim? Can Serena, who is one of the sport's fastest players, be at times a pusher?
ziggy2shus3 likes this.
shap_half is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 01:44 PM
Senior Member
 
goldenlox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the cloud
Posts: 111,932
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

A lot of people like the ball bashers. I dont know why there has to be these 2 groupings
What is Djokovic? He is a great mover who plays great defense

The most wasted of all days is one without laughter....
Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there
Enjoy This Moment!!
HEALTH and HAPPINESS to EVERYONE

goldenlox is offline  
post #3 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 01:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Baby-Ma's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Brissy
Posts: 15,564
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Pushers are no better than brainless ball bashers, their only goal is to keep the ball in play with no plan B.

Golden Flowers' Slams


Asian GOAT Na Li(2): 2011 & 2014
Doubles specialist Shuai Peng(2): 2013 & 2014
Brainfarted Zhang Shuai (1): 2019
Retirement Village: Zi(2), Jie(2) & Tiantian(1 + 1 OG Gold)
"Heart problems", "medical reasons"...
Baby-Ma is online now  
 
post #4 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 01:48 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
shap_half's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 17,269
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby-Ma View Post
Pushers are no better than brainless ball bashers, their only goal is to keep the ball in play with no plan B.
Does such a player, someone who has no other intention on the court other than dink the ball back, exist at this level of tennis?
shap_half is online now  
post #5 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Super Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 45,374
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Super Dave is offline  
post #6 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
wolf79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: savage summits
Posts: 22,358
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

because woz.


You're like the Ocean and I'm desperate to drown.


forever Clexa
wolf79 is offline  
post #7 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:03 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 10,882
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

I think, from what I've seen, that many TF posters regard players who don't hit the ball "hard" as pushers. There are already some problems with this definition, IMO - how do you tell if a ball is hit "hard" or not? What are the standards or determinants behind this?

I generally don't believe in this concept of pushers - I think that most players tend to try to do things with the ball - for instance, many regard Wozniacki, Kerber and Radwanska as pushers on the board. I do think that their general instinct is to be defensive because of their confidence in their ability to chase down the balls, but I actually don't think they are pushers as much as they are made out to be. Kerber certainly isn't one; her FHDTL is as offensive a weapon as any other player's, IMO. Radwanska doesn't hit with power, but she plays with more variety and shot placement to extract errors, or to put her opponents out of position to hit winners. Wozniacki - sometimes plays like a pusher - especially when she plays against a ballbasher (like Madison Keys), but I do think if she can attack she would, too - and I have seen her do so, especially with her BH.

One more thing is that these players who tend to lack power (in the conventional TF sense) like Kerber or Radwanska are very dependent on match-ups. Sometimes, when they play people like Sharapova or Serena, they are made to look like "pushers" because they can't implement their game styles effectively - since IMO, they tend to revert back to their defensive instincts rather than play aggressively in these matches.

I do think that there are some players on tour that are true pushers (ie. no weapons and wait for opponents' errors), but I don't think anyone in the top 100 can be classified as one because certainly, they must possess at least a decent enough finishing shot (Woz's BH, Kerber's FHDTL, Aga's volleys/dropshots) to make it that high in the rankings.

One example of this type of "clear pushing" would be what Polona Hercog did against Coco Gauff. Now, THAT is real pushing - clearly waiting for errors and not doing anything to the ball except getting it back in play - but I don't think anyone employs such a boring slice-and-dice game as their main gamestyle on tour.

But honestly I don't see anything wrong with playing like a pusher IMO, running down balls is also a skill and is a testament to their physical fitness and work done off the court. Of course this means that their tennis isn't the most aesthetically pleasing, but that's why tennis (and sport in general) is so entertaining - watching different styles succeed in different ways. After all, it's all about winning matches on tour, and if pushing helps a player win a majority of their matches (ie. more than .500), then I don't see a problem with it.
Tripolis is offline  
post #8 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:10 PM
Senior Member
 
goldenlox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: the cloud
Posts: 111,932
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

From what I understand, pusher doesnt mean Stephens or Halep or Brengle, just Wozniacki, who did okay with it, 30 titles including a major and YEC and over $33M in prizemoney
GrumpyOldBoy likes this.

The most wasted of all days is one without laughter....
Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there
Enjoy This Moment!!
HEALTH and HAPPINESS to EVERYONE

goldenlox is offline  
post #9 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 248
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

I remember Andy Murray's beginings when he defeated Federer in one tournament in US, i think, i can't remember which one. After the match, mister Perfect, the most elegant, gracious, mannered etc, player in history said that his opponent did literally nothing but put the ball back in play. In the women's game, at the top of it anyway, the real, original, The Pusher, is Wozniacki, although she did win Singapore with a totally different approach, like it was a totally different player (i blame Bajin for that), and sometimes (ok, not sometimes, quite often) Kerber, she's an ace of pushing too, but she can attack as well, more often than Wozniacki. I've got nothing against pushing, although it can be very annoying if they play against your fave and they act like a freaking wall, my only problem is with Wozniaki's character and, when i see her disgusting antics, her playing style makes me nauseous as well. Hingis was no pusher by any means, she was one of the most technically gifted players ever, alongside Aga, although i liked Hingis, but not Aga. Hingis had more power also, she was a joy to watch. Bashing, instead, i hate with all my guts. That's not tennis, they should make a separate sport for the bashers, as well as for the men's servebots.
Burn is offline  
post #10 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:14 PM
Senior Member
 
MalJackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,086
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Svitolina P5/M queen

Tsitsipas & Sakkari outed by spiceboy

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiceboy View Post
Both are cute and both are gay. Kinda sad to see this these days but that's their choice (or their PR teams' probably).
MalJackson is offline  
post #11 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:17 PM
Senior Member
 
AlexMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 1,615
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tripolis View Post
I think, from what I've seen, that many TF posters regard players who don't hit the ball "hard" as pushers. There are already some problems with this definition, IMO - how do you tell if a ball is hit "hard" or not? What are the standards or determinants behind this?
It used to be that, now it's just a player you don't like is automatically tagged as either a pusher or a brainless ball basher. Expecting consistency here is ridiculous, because you're not going to get any of that. Halep hits harder than most of the presumed ball bashers and she's still called a pusher.

The key to a modern tennis player is to first of all have a great defense that you can then turn into offense to break your opponent's serve. And yes of course you need a good serve so you can hold on to that break. And when you are faced with an equally good defender you need to be able to rally and know when to attack at the right ball and not before that. It's very simple on paper but extremely hard to master. If you look back at the history of tennis these are the best of the best, you can't just bash the ball or push it past the net.

But again it's never about that with people here, it's just I don't like X player and she's more defensive so I'll call her a pusher, and same thing with BBB (Brainless-Ball-Basher) if we're talking about a more offensive player. It really is as simple as simple as that.
AlexMA is online now  
post #12 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 248
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MalJackson View Post
Svitolina P5/M queen
Oh, yes, how could i forget Svitolina? Uglier technique than Woznkiaki, if that's even possible.
Perun likes this.
Burn is offline  
post #13 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:19 PM
Senior Member
 
MalJackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 10,086
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Burn View Post
Oh, yes, how could i forget Svitolina? Uglier technique than Woznkiaki, if that's even possible.
Be careful....You're criticising a future multiple grand slam winner.
s0higher and Perun like this.

Tsitsipas & Sakkari outed by spiceboy

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiceboy View Post
Both are cute and both are gay. Kinda sad to see this these days but that's their choice (or their PR teams' probably).
MalJackson is offline  
post #14 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Porto
Posts: 446
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

I don't mind PUSHERS, but "COUNTERPUNCHERS" is absolutely pathetic. Moreover it's a shitty boxing term.
lima isai is offline  
post #15 of 119 (permalink) Old Jul 16th, 2019, 02:27 PM
Senior Member
 
Miracle Worker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Universe
Posts: 29,758
                     
Re: When did we become obsessed with "pushers?"

Quote:
Originally Posted by goldenlox View Post
From what I understand, pusher doesnt mean Stephens or Halep or Brengle, just Wozniacki, who did okay with it, 30 titles including a major and YEC and over $33M in prizemoney
Brengle is junkballer, Stephens is too lazy to be a pusher and Halep is good in pushing but it seems it's rather her main strategy than type of game.

In the same time we have a Push Queen Caroline The Danish Wall.
Perun likes this.

The Brainless Pusher
Ernests Gulbis, Marin Cilic, John Isner
Gilles Simon, Nicolas Almagro, Tommy Haas, Jack Sock
Kimiko Date Krumm, Tomas Berdych, Michail Youzhny, Daniel Brands
Elena Dementieva, Julia Cohen, Anna Chakvetadze
Miracle Worker is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome