Kim for POY? - TennisForum.com
View Poll Results: POY?
Yes 3 60.00%
No 0 0%
She'll win one but not both (WTA and ITF) 2 40.00%
Voters: 5. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old Nov 1st, 2010, 03:58 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
wateva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 18,802
                     
Kim for POY?

A more civilised discussion for kim fans here.
I don't know but I think caro is out of the contention given that she lost in YEC. (although she has the number 1 ranking)
So I guess it's between Serena and Kim?
What are your views?

Kim Clijsters Welcome back
wateva is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old Nov 3rd, 2010, 11:06 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25,232
                     
Re: Kim for POY?

Well let me blurt out some info here.

Serena won two slams at AO & Wimby, made the quarters at the FO (her only other slam appearance apart from those 2 other slam wins) & had a 25-4 win loss record (86%). That is impressive for someone who has only played 6 events this year. However she didn't play for the rest of the year after Wimby (not her fault by any means) & her performances at the 3 non-slam events she contested weren't fantastic, but decent (Sydney RU, Rome SF & Madrid 3R).

Kim won the USO, the YEC (second biggest to the slams with only the best eight playing there), Miami (big non-slam event), Cincinnati (not as big as the other three, but still big) & Brisbane - so five title, three more than Serena. Other two slam performances were somewhat just a bit above average - Wimby QF & AO 3R. She did make the quarters of better at eight of her eleven events she played & had a 40-7 win loss record (85%).

Considering those stats, they are impressive in many different ways. Even though Serena did win two titles for 2010, they were the ones they carry a lot more historical importance & weight. However Kim won one of those as well too & the YEC, which if not more important than the slams is a close second. A GS & YEC plus Miami & Cincinnati are either on equal par with Serena's two slams or just slightly close from equalling the prestige.

I could think of a lot more reasons for who should be player of the year & it was difficult to pick between the two. I'm going to give it to Serena, but only just - because her two slams only by a fraction (5-10%) outweigh Kim's 5 titles. However I have a feeling that the ITF will either pick Kim or Caro, & the WTA will pick either Serena or Kim. I mean the ITF picked Hingis in 2000 & she didn't a slam, but was year-end No.1 & was super consistent & the WTA picked Venus & she won two slams & an olympic gold & was on a 30+ win streak at one point.
Ben. is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome