Is College Tennis DEAD??? - TennisForum.com
 1Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 49 (permalink) Old Dec 9th, 2017, 05:35 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Is College Tennis DEAD???

Pac-12 teams had a strong run (2012-2015) with USC challenging Stanford, then UCLA rising to prominence, and CAL in the mix. Most of those players graduated or turned pro and the roster isn't as formidable as before. In fact, I have to wonder if college tennis is being bypassed, altogether by the top American junior players.

First Mal Burdette turned pro, prompting Gibbsy to turn pro the following year. I knew Brady had a higher ceiling, although she played mostly #2 and #3 at UCLA. I think Robin Anderson is still on the tour, and so is Sabrina Santamaria and doubles specialist KK.

When I look at the November 15 rankings, 4 out of 5 players are recruited internationally. Many I have not heard of their names before. Those players are more likely to stay 4 years and cash in on a college education; whereas, American players see less value in a college education and see bigger rewards turning pro.

Then there's the impact of the rules changing to speed up the game. I am not a big fan of no-ad scoring. Honestly, if I wanted the match to end in less than an hour, I would rather go see a movie!
As a tennis fan, trying to watch all of the action on 6 courts is hard enough, then speeding it up, is putting the nail to the coffin. Top players with emphasis on turning pro, haven't found this rule change to be favorable. Now any player can win it if the match gets close. It use to be that the top players can always have time to comeback and work themselves back into the match. That's not necessarily the case anymore. It's now and even playing field.

Probably not good for college tennis.

Not much excitement going on in this forum in retrospect.
It's the death of college tennis and this forum...allegedly!
tie_breaker is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 49 (permalink) Old Dec 9th, 2017, 05:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: IN
Posts: 1,850
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

As someone who is in college and plays tennis, I see it. It is just not popular among youngsters nowadays. They watch/play football and basketball. On public tennis courts, I mostly see older generations playing tennis (30's and up) and play with them. I'm like always the youngest one. And there is a disproportionate number of non-Americans, mostly from China and India (! to my surprise)
Povin is offline  
post #3 of 49 (permalink) Old Dec 22nd, 2017, 03:53 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

It is now official...

tie_breaker is offline  
 
post #4 of 49 (permalink) Old Dec 22nd, 2017, 02:42 PM
Senior Member
 
tucker1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 24,366
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
It is now official...

What happened?!
tucker1989 is online now  
post #5 of 49 (permalink) Old Dec 23rd, 2017, 07:51 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by tucker1989 View Post
What happened?!
Bank of the West will no longer be held at Stanford, which I think is a big blow to Stanford Tennis, as it allowed its players a wild card slot.

I just think the program is going downhill...
tie_breaker is offline  
post #6 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 3rd, 2018, 06:33 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 14
 
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
Bank of the West will no longer be held at Stanford, which I think is a big blow to Stanford Tennis, as it allowed its players a wild card slot.

I just think the program is going downhill...
Saying the program is going downhill is a little morbid, no? While certainly the lack of BOW WC hurts their recruiting and they probably won't be winning 3 straight or 5 of the last 6 like they did in the early 2000s, they still won in 2016 and made the finals in 2017. Plus they're the pre-season #1.
jwilsontennis is offline  
post #7 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 4th, 2018, 03:58 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwilsontennis View Post
Saying the program is going downhill is a little morbid, no?
I thought the photo is morbid.



Quote:
Originally Posted by jwilsontennis View Post
While certainly the lack of BOW WC hurts their recruiting and they probably won't be winning 3 straight or 5 of the last 6 like they did in the early 2000s, they still won in 2016 and made the finals in 2017. Plus they're the pre-season #1.
You know the rankings don't mean a thing.

Gordon looks to have the most potential to be a #1 player, since Gibbs/Ahn. Lord will start at #1 and Gordon at #2. Lampl has been clutch, but not consistent. I wonder if Arbuthnott will leap frog her and play at #3. Higuchi should be solid at #5. Shin will be at #6, hopefully, she'll be machine#2.

Maybe an outside threat at #4, but I think too many teams are equally competitive and their recruiting has suffered as top junior players (Bellis, Day, Liu) turned pro and more international players have leveled the playing field.
tie_breaker is offline  
post #8 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 4th, 2018, 02:09 PM
Team WTAworld
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,143
                     
Zhao might be the best or one of the best Stanford players of that group when all is said and done.
Simplicity. is offline  
post #9 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 4th, 2018, 04:14 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 14
 
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post

You know the rankings don't mean a thing.

Gordon looks to have the most potential to be a #1 player, since Gibbs/Ahn. Lord will start at #1 and Gordon at #2. Lampl has been clutch, but not consistent. I wonder if Arbuthnott will leap frog her and play at #3. Higuchi should be solid at #5. Shin will be at #6, hopefully, she'll be machine#2.

Maybe an outside threat at #4, but I think too many teams are equally competitive and their recruiting has suffered as top junior players (Bellis, Day, Liu) turned pro and more international players have leveled the playing field.
Yea, rankings are sometimes laughable but this is the coaches poll so I think it's a good indication that coaches believe Stanford is also a threat for the title this year. But I think you're right that Stanford plays high risk/high reward (because they can) with their recruiting by going for girls who will maybe go pro and a lot of other schools are becoming competitive and also have less academic restrictions than Stanford. I think just like other sports, we'll start to see more parity across more schools as schools continue to invest more resources to keep up with the Stanford's of the world.

My prediction for Stanford's May lineup:
1. Gordon
2. Lord
3. Arbuthnott
4. Lampl
5. Higuchi
6. Shin

That's a pretty strong lineup if Arbuthnott continues her good form and Lampl steps it up.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simplicity. View Post
Zhao might be the best or one of the best Stanford players of that group when all is said and done.
Yea which is sho shocking to me. She finished 2017 strong so we'll see if she can keep it up in 2018. I remember rolling my eyes when she turned pro since she had a disappointing last year in college.
jwilsontennis is offline  
post #10 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 5th, 2018, 03:30 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simplicity. View Post
Zhao might be the best or one of the best Stanford players of that group when all is said and done.
My bet is on Ahn, as I feel she could handle the power better against bigger opponents.
I was impressed with Zhao, early on at Stanford, but she was flat her last year and I really had no idea she was going to turn pro. She plays mostly Canadian tournaments, so I haven't seen her play all that much to give her a fair opinion of her recent strong performance in 2017.
tie_breaker is offline  
post #11 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 5th, 2018, 03:43 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwilsontennis View Post
Yea, rankings are sometimes laughable but this is the coaches poll so I think it's a good indication that coaches believe Stanford is also a threat for the title this year. But I think you're right that Stanford plays high risk/high reward (because they can) with their recruiting by going for girls who will maybe go pro and a lot of other schools are becoming competitive and also have less academic restrictions than Stanford. I think just like other sports, we'll start to see more parity across more schools as schools continue to invest more resources to keep up with the Stanford's of the world.

My prediction for Stanford's May lineup:
1. Gordon
2. Lord
3. Arbuthnott
4. Lampl
5. Higuchi
6. Shin
I agree that may be the ending line-up, but Lele usually doesn't allow a Freshman to leap frog a player, who played #1 and #2, so I say she starts with Lord at #1.

I really hope Lampl has a better year. She usually takes a set to get warmed up and find her groove, which worries, me with having to win 3 set matches all the time. I think Lampl and Shin may be the weakest links at this point, although having not seen Shin play, yet, but heard that she chases everything down.

Stanford #1? I don't know what happened to Ingrid Neel, but Gators lost alot of ground on Stanford. I predicted that Di Lorenzo was going to turn pro, but I thought she was going to give it another year and give Ohio a title shot. I think North Carolina and Vanderbilt have a good shot and I wouldn't count out Pepperdine as a dark horse, now that the ice princess is there. I hope to see more competition from Pac-12 with 2 or 3 teams in Top 10.
tie_breaker is offline  
post #12 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 5th, 2018, 04:06 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 14
 
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
I agree that may be the ending line-up, but Lele usually doesn't allow a Freshman to leap frog a player, who played #1 and #2, so I say she starts with Lord at #1.

I really hope Lampl has a better year. She usually takes a set to get warmed up and find her groove, which worries, me with having to win 3 set matches all the time. I think Lampl and Shin may be the weakest links at this point, although having not seen Shin play, yet, but heard that she chases everything down.

Stanford #1? I don't know what happened to Ingrid Neel, but Gators lost alot of ground on Stanford. I predicted that Di Lorenzo was going to turn pro, but I thought she was going to give it another year and give Ohio a title shot. I think North Carolina and Vanderbilt have a good shot and I wouldn't count out Pepperdine as a dark horse, now that the ice princess is there. I hope to see more competition from Pac-12 with 2 or 3 teams in Top 10.
That will probably make for a solid #6 then haha.

I agree, I think the front runners are Stanford, UNC, Vandy, Florida and Pepperdine who all appear pretty equal on paper. For some reason I thought Stefani left but with her back Pepperdine is a top contender. Despite not playing the indoors again this year, Stanford was smart to schedule Vanderbilt, Florida, and Pepperdine to try and buoy their ranking (assuming they win) since UCLA, USC, and Cal probably won't be ranked that high this year.
jwilsontennis is offline  
post #13 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 5th, 2018, 04:15 PM
Rise up from ignorance
 
Monzanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 16,707
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Athletics and golf are probably the only individual sports that actually profit from being a part of NCAA? Can anyone enlighten me here?

Any sport that has majority of athletes turning pro while still in their teens is DOA in the NCAA system IMO.

Maria Sharapova: Mind Over Matter
FITD: Winner - Portoroz '10, Tashkent '11, Istanbul YEC '11; Suicide: Winner - Fes '11, Memphis '12, Nuernberg '13, Sofia TOC '13, Hobart '15, Tianjin '15, Zhuhai ET '15, Tianjin '16, Taiwan '17
TT: Winner - (Singles) Tashkent '12; ITF Macon '16, Stockton '16, Scottsdale '16 (Doubles) - (w/Broseghini) Cuneo 100k '10; (w/Peek-A-Boo) Contrexeville 50k '10; (w/JustPetko) Bucharest 75k '10, Nantes 50k '10, Marbella '11, Washington '11, Linz '11, Istanbul YEC '11, Opole 25K '11, Pattaya City '12, Tashkent '12, Pune 125k '12, Memphis '13, Carlsbad '13, Marrakech '14, Washington '14, Hong Kong 25k '16
Monzanator is offline  
post #14 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 5th, 2018, 05:06 PM
Rise up from ignorance
 
Monzanator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 16,707
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Yeah, I'm aware of ice hockey standards. I didn't know they play hockey in NCAA. What's the point if you've got all these farm teams and God knows how many lower leagues?

I recall NCAA made some rule changes that prevents players going to NBA straight from high school (like Bryant and Garnett did). Now everyone has to play at least one season at college? Basketball is probably the second best-selling NCAA sport after football?

Maria Sharapova: Mind Over Matter
FITD: Winner - Portoroz '10, Tashkent '11, Istanbul YEC '11; Suicide: Winner - Fes '11, Memphis '12, Nuernberg '13, Sofia TOC '13, Hobart '15, Tianjin '15, Zhuhai ET '15, Tianjin '16, Taiwan '17
TT: Winner - (Singles) Tashkent '12; ITF Macon '16, Stockton '16, Scottsdale '16 (Doubles) - (w/Broseghini) Cuneo 100k '10; (w/Peek-A-Boo) Contrexeville 50k '10; (w/JustPetko) Bucharest 75k '10, Nantes 50k '10, Marbella '11, Washington '11, Linz '11, Istanbul YEC '11, Opole 25K '11, Pattaya City '12, Tashkent '12, Pune 125k '12, Memphis '13, Carlsbad '13, Marrakech '14, Washington '14, Hong Kong 25k '16
Monzanator is offline  
post #15 of 49 (permalink) Old Jan 6th, 2018, 04:26 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,717
                     
Re: Is College Tennis DEAD???

Quote:
Originally Posted by wta_zuperfann View Post
As with tennis, if you have aspirations of turning pro in hockey (and soccer) college is not the proper place to go.
Agree and the top tennis prospects do turn pro, but its a risky gamble considering that expenses on the tennis pro tour could run up to $150k a year. Just playing on the junior tour, parents can easily spend $2,000 to $3,000/month from age 12 to age 18.

A college scholarship offers a pay-off for the parents investment.
tie_breaker is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome