Equalizing the Surfaces - Has it been good for the game? - Page 2 - TennisForum.com
TennisForum.com   Wagerline.com MensTennisForums.com TennisUniverse.com
TennisForum.com is the premier Women's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply

Old Oct 5th, 2013, 01:43 AM   #16
country flag dwyerfan
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 73
dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light dwyerfan is a glorious beacon of light
Re: Equalizing the Surfaces - Has it been good for the game?

As for McEnroe taking a French on todays courts, McEnroe wouldnt in a million years beat Nadal on any type of clay, and he had only one year he played well on clay anyway- 1984.
dwyerfan is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old Oct 6th, 2013, 12:50 PM   #17
country flag Ms. Anthropic
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,222
Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all Ms. Anthropic is a name known to all
Re: Equalizing the Surfaces - Has it been good for the game?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dwyerfan View Post
I am not sure Lendl would have won a Wimbledon title on todays courts. I would see Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, and Murray all being too much for him from the baseline, and his serve and volley game was never natural or finely tuned. Either way that doesnt really do anything to prove or disprove your point which would be a baseliner having a better shot, which in Lendl's case would be true even if a group of superior baseliners in this time would have likely prevented it regardless.
I took the original premise to mean, for example, Lendl would have won Wimbledon versus the competition at the time if the grass had played like it does now. And while I could see Lendl beating, say, Cash with the current court conditions, the biggest thing to consider is that Cash himself (and the other dedicated net-rushers) would play differently if the attempt to homogenize the surfaces had been in effect. Unless we're talking about they happened to spring the change on the players rather quickly from 1986 to 1987.
Ms. Anthropic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 23rd, 2013, 01:16 PM   #18
country flag GHFB
Junior Member
 
GHFB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 11
GHFB is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Equalizing the Surfaces - Has it been good for the game?

I think the new racquet and (especially so) string technologies have had a huge impact. With the equipment so powerful (and forgiving) all-court tennis (forget about S&V) is redundant - it's easier to stay on the baseline, regardless of surface, so the powers that be have gone with the flow and slowed down the surfaces to compliment the power baseline style. The courts during Wimbledon indicate just how much the game has changed in 10-15 years - no scuffed baseline, no scuffed service line; just a bare strip the length of the baseline, about a metre behind it.
GHFB is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios