 |
|
Jan 26th, 2013, 11:09 PM
|
#76
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Out of radar..
Posts: 1,255
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeucesAreWild
She's great for the WTA! She's a Champion and has personality. Love her or hate her, you cannot ignore her.
Same goes for Sharapova, Williams Sisters, ect...
|
Basically this...
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Jan 26th, 2013, 11:38 PM
|
#77
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11,993
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
I agree, her crying made me warm toward her........ I see that as a desperate cry, relief..... It's godd that our number 1 has 2 slams to her name.
__________________
Ivanovic - Görges - Li
Venus - Radwanska - Woz - Kvitova - Putintseva - Robson - Stosur - Cibulkova - Vinci
Shvedova Golden Set against a top 10, THE most dificult and humiliating feat in tennis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue8UJ...layer_embedded
|
|
|
Jan 26th, 2013, 11:39 PM
|
#78
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,282
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
She is replacing Serena as the tour's worse villian
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 03:01 AM
|
#79
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,686
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Well i don't know about good, but definitely she is better than Wozniacki. That was an all-time low for WTA when Wozniacki was no. 1.
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 03:18 AM
|
#80
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 18
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
She won't be #1 anymore at the end of RG, anyway.
No worries. 
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 04:01 AM
|
#81
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 163
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deestruction
Caro can have the fans, while Vika earns more of my respect because at least shes winning more matches. I dont care if she has the least fans in the world. It doesnt take away from the fact that shes a better player than Caro. I dont hate Caro but thats kinda ridiculous to put Caro as a better player than Vika just because she has more and better fans. 
|
WTA is different from ATP cause it attracts attention not soly on match itself. Girls that really conquer the public matter in the improvement of WTA. If people just want to see how well our No.1 plays, it is better for them to watch some scrubs in ATP. Azarenka's grunt is disgusting to hear, not to mention her ugly personality. No wonder Austrlia fans hate her so much.
She is a disgrace and threat to the development of WTA. Serena must slap her agian and get that No.1 back to her pocket.
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 04:06 AM
|
#82
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 8,953
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
She's good in that she's better than Wozniacki, Safina, Ivanovic and Jankovic.
__________________
I always wanted to be somebody. If I made it, it's half because I was game enough to take a lot of punishment along the way and half because there were a lot of people who cared enough to help me.
-Althea Gibson
Quote:
Originally Posted by darrinbaker00
When will you learn that "pushers" never make it past the club level, let alone #1 on the WTA computer? Will it be too late?
|
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 01:13 PM
|
#83
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,558
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Who's good for the WTA? Serena and Sharapova are global brands, Azarenka is pretty irrelevant as a sports personality outside Belarus. That says it all.
__________________
Sabine Lisicki Andrea Petkovic Julia Görges
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 03:36 PM
|
#84
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7,345
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcesHigh
She's good in that she's better than Wozniacki, Safina, Ivanovic and Jankovic.
|
definitely Wozniacki and Ivanovic have better potential for "tennis stars" than Azarenka, their problem is tennis results.....
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 03:50 PM
|
#85
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,244
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by NashaMasha
definitely Wozniacki and Ivanovic have better potential for "tennis stars" than Azarenka, their problem is tennis results.....
|
Whilst their results have not been great lately they are all more interesting players. Azarenka fans boast about her 2 slams but let's get real. Slams are also only tournaments like the other ones. Quite frankly, there were a lot more interesting finals at non-slam events than the one we saw at the AO yesterday. Not to mention all that awkward drama about Azarenka's shady tactics. 
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 03:51 PM
|
#86
|
|
Undefeated
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,347
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineblue
Whilst their results have not been great lately they are all more interesting players. Azarenka fans boast about her 2 slams but let's get real. Slams are also only tournaments like the other ones. Quite frankly, there were a lot more interesting finals at non-slam events than the one we saw at the AO yesterday. Not to mention all that awkward drama about Azarenka's shady tactics. 
|
She also has won Beijing, IW, Doha, made a final at Madrid, SF at Wimbledon etc... all in the past 12 months - Your point being?
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 03:57 PM
|
#87
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7,345
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineblue
Whilst their results have not been great lately they are all more interesting players. Azarenka fans boast about her 2 slams but let's get real. Slams are also only tournaments like the other ones. Quite frankly, there were a lot more interesting finals at non-slam events than the one we saw at the AO yesterday. Not to mention all that awkward drama about Azarenka's shady tactics. 
|
actually this AO reached the bottom line in terms of quality matches and the winner showed the weakest game ever for the Major winner. Azarenka 2012 was far inferiour to Azarenka 2011, it's ridiculous that she still managed to win the trophy , but with this draw and Serena and Li Na injured, anyone "a bit better than Jamie Hampton" could have won it with that draw and that luck
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 04:07 PM
|
#88
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 4,244
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmie48
She also has won Beijing, IW, Doha, made a final at Madrid, SF at Wimbledon etc... all in the past 12 months - Your point being?
|
I think my point was pretty clear,try reading again.
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 04:25 PM
|
#89
|
|
Undefeated
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,347
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by marineblue
I think my point was pretty clear,try reading again.
|
You hate her, I get it.
|
|
|
Jan 27th, 2013, 04:41 PM
|
#90
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 4,919
|
Re: Victoria Azarenka is good for the WTA
Quote:
Originally Posted by NashaMasha
definitely Wozniacki and Ivanovic have better potential for "tennis stars" than Azarenka, their problem is tennis results.....
|
Marta Domachowska, Genie Bourchard, Diatchenko...etc have better potential than Woz and Ivavovic
In other words potential-stardom is meaningless.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|